Can we chunk people that way, though? I have difficulty even seeing two people as a unit in my head ... it's easier for me to assign a single trait to many individuals separately than to create a mental category.
While I can say to myself that X, Y, Z, A, B, C are all, say, "coworkers," that doesn't mean that I can assign "coworkers" to a slot and view them as a unit. Almost immediately there will be subcategories -- coworkers I like, coworkers I don't like, coworkers I enjoy working with, coworkers who need to be suspended by a rope over a pit of spikes, and so forth. The category breaks down, and turns from a top-down category into just one more bottom-up trait.
I'm frankly suspicious of the notion that we truly can take an entire category and feel the same emotional strength towards every member of it that we can towards a single person. Remember, throughout history revolutionary movements have had to have an enemy figurehead because people just can't stir up as much hate against anything as nebulous as an organization.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-07 11:35 pm (UTC)While I can say to myself that X, Y, Z, A, B, C are all, say, "coworkers," that doesn't mean that I can assign "coworkers" to a slot and view them as a unit. Almost immediately there will be subcategories -- coworkers I like, coworkers I don't like, coworkers I enjoy working with, coworkers who need to be suspended by a rope over a pit of spikes, and so forth. The category breaks down, and turns from a top-down category into just one more bottom-up trait.
I'm frankly suspicious of the notion that we truly can take an entire category and feel the same emotional strength towards every member of it that we can towards a single person. Remember, throughout history revolutionary movements have had to have an enemy figurehead because people just can't stir up as much hate against anything as nebulous as an organization.