new year, new insurance

Jan. 8th, 2026 12:53 am
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
[personal profile] redbird
I gave Capsule my new insurance information, and then had them deliver a prescription.

I will need/use the inhaler, but this is also confirmation that yes, I (still) have prescription drug coverage.

Other than that, not a great day. Fingertips are improving, but I had a sudden nosebleed while sitting quietly on the couch an hour ago. *sigh*

Sigma

Jan. 7th, 2026 11:36 pm
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
Remember Sigma?

Was there ever a membership list made public?
renay: photo of the milky way from new zealand on a clear night (Default)
[personal profile] renay posting in [community profile] ladybusiness
2025 was the first year my reading started to feel less like a miracle and more like, "oh yeah, reading! I do that without struggling." I read 78 books, although a lot of them were rereads. I'm happy to reread The Murderbot Diaries and a bunch of my favorite romance novels a few times a year. The brain craves familiarity.

I have elevenish favorites this year (I combined books in series, because I make the rules). My top book, which is no big secret as I've been shouting about it for months, is the only one ranked; the rest are here in alphabetical order.

Favorite Books )

The numbers and musings )

That's a wrap on 2025! If you read any of my favorites and have readalikes, I'm always hyped for recs. If you wrote a favorites post for your SFF reading, I'd love to see it (and then link it in Intergalactic Mixtape, haha).
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll


This all-new Painted Wastelands Bundle tours The Painted Wastelands, a prismatic pastel realm from Agamemnon Press for use with Old-School Essentials and other tabletop fantasy roleplaying games.

Bundle of Holding: The Painted Wastelands

Tomorrow never knows

Jan. 7th, 2026 08:54 pm
[syndicated profile] slacktivist_feed

Posted by Fred Clark

We have always been at war with ... Greenland? This was never the Proper Christian Stance enforced by white evangelical leaders, but the Proper Christian Stance is always changing.

The Big Idea: Warren Tusk

Jan. 7th, 2026 06:49 pm
[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by Athena Scalzi

Life isn’t fair. But it also isn’t unfair, it just is. As author Warren Tusk puts it in his Big Idea for The Goetist: the cosmos are indifferent. Follow along in the Big Idea for a philosophical journey through one’s sense of self and the meaning of being you.

WARREN TUSK:

The despairing man calls forth a demon, and binds it to teach him, so that he can stop feeling so empty and start finding something worthwhile in his life. And, once the formalities are done, his first question is – What is magic?

…this is weird, right? On the face of it, anyway. It’s weird because his question doesn’t obviously address his stated problem. He doesn’t lack for magic; he just summoned a demon. He lacks fulfillment and joy and meaning. He should be asking about those things.  

The trick is that – at least within the goetist’s mind – it’s all the same stuff. He experiences the hollowness of his days as an absence of magic, and his own sorcerous power doesn’t change that. When he tries to fumble his way towards an escape from his unhappiness, he instinctively reaches out towards magic. 

Which is not insane. At least, I hope it’s not insane, because I do the exact same thing. And so do lots of other people. When we look around at our world and find it bleak, and try to understand the nature of that bleakness, we call it disenchanted. We jump eagerly into the fake worlds of fantasy literature, not because they’re happier or more fun than the real world, not even necessarily because they’re more interesting – Lord knows they’re not always interesting – but because they’re magical, and that in itself is a thing for which we hunger. 

How can magic actually help?

Hard to answer that if we don’t understand what we’re talking about, if we don’t define our terms. So let’s go back to the goetist’s question. What is magic?

The old answer, the obvious answer, is that it’s about power. Doing the impossible. Magicians can accomplish things that other people can’t. 

Except that, in an age of technical wonders, the old obvious answer is no longer tenable. Doing the impossible is no longer something we associate with enchantment; people do the impossible all the time, these days, and there’s nothing remotely enchanted about it. The mighty mages of our fantasy stories use a lot of their power to replicate the effects of…cell phones, and security cameras, and airplanes, and modern medical treatments. (To say nothing of guns and bombs.) And we have all those things for real, and they’re wondrous and we wouldn’t know how to live without them, but their presence doesn’t leave us feeling like the world is filled with magic. Quite the opposite, much of the time. 

The demon has a different answer. As he explains it: magic is what you call it when the world truly, deeply cares about who you are. About you-as-a-person. About the particularities of your virtues and your vices, your talents and your interests. 

The magic sword is magic because only a true hero, pure of heart, can wield it. The magic sacrifice is magic because it works only when you give up something that genuinely matters to you. 

Technology doesn’t care about things like that, because physical reality doesn’t care. You don’t need to be a true hero to fire a machine gun; the laws of thermodynamics don’t change based on emotional salience. And as we spend more and more of our lives integrating into large impersonal systems, it becomes increasingly true that most of the social world doesn’t care about our individual particularities either.

(I could spend a long time talking about how the intricacies of the self are stripped away by jobs, by dating apps, even by the effort to market a constructed “self” as a brand. But you can fill in all of that yourself.) 

It’s easy to complain about modern anomie. The truth is, though – this modern condition is just an exaggeration, an exacerbation, of the way that things have always been. Physical reality, and social reality, have never answered to the complexities of anyone’s internal experience. The sun rises and sets, the crops grow, the village resolves its disputes, and all the elaborate patterns of your selfhood just come out in the wash.

There will be no magic unless someone cares. And the world won’t care. So you have to care. The shape of your soul has to matter to you, even if external reality will never notice. If you’re lucky, maybe you can find some other people who will also care, and you can care about the shape of their souls, and you can build some relationships in the face of the indifferent cosmos. But whether or not you’re lucky in that way – if you can believe that it matters who you are, without any feedback or validation, then you can enchant the world.   

The Goetist is a wisdom book, which is to say, a book composed entirely of Big Ideas. It has crammed as many of them as possible into a short text, by jettisoning things like “plot” and “having more than two characters.” It goes through a lot of topics, and tries to pull philosophy out of all of them. But the very first Big Idea, on which all the others are built, is: Magic is the foundation of a meaningful life, and magic consists of caring about who you are. Not instrumentally, not as a means to an end, but as something irreducibly precious. The rest of the book is really just discussing a bunch of different ways to act on that principle.

It’s a principle that matters a lot to me, personally. I hold onto it tightly, because the wider world really is indifferent, and that’s a hard thing. And if you want to know why I wrote The Goetist in the first place – well, that’s why. 

You can summon a demon with magic because the demon will see you for what you are, and you will see it for what it is, and you will matter to one another. Kind of like with a writer and a reader. 


The Goetist: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Bookshop|Powell’s|Apocryphile Press

You can see more of the author’s work at Paracelsus Games.

Books read, November-December 2025

Jan. 7th, 2026 06:20 pm
swan_tower: (Default)
[personal profile] swan_tower
I have fallen out of the habit of doing these posts! I stopped for a while when I couldn't talk about Sea Beyond research, then failed to really ingrain the practice again. But no time like the present to start up once more!

What if the Moon Didn’t Exist? Voyages to Earths That Might Have Been, Neil F. Comins. I would not call this book well-written on a prose level, but it's conceptually interesting. Comins goes through a number of different astronomical scenarios and looks at, not just what that would look like now, but how it would (likely) affect things such as the evolution of life. For example, if the moon were closer to Earth, tides would be much stronger, greatly increasing the distance covered by the tidal zone, which would make it harder for sea life to transition onto dry land.

Worth noting, though, that this was originally published in 1993, so it doesn't take into account more recent advancements in astronomy and biology. We'd just barely confirmed our first exoplanet sighting back then, and also Comins very much assumes that "life" must look like it does here. On the other hand, it's sort of charming -- in this age of climate change -- to see his final chapter explore a doomsday scenario where we've completely wrecked the ozone layer, which was a major concern at the time. (In fact the "ozone hole" is healing now, and we should be back to 1980 levels within the next couple of decades.)

Comins has another book along these lines, What If the Earth Had Two Moons?, which I may pick up. Dry prose notwithstanding, these are very interesting to read with an eye toward designing different kinds of worlds!

And Dangerous to Know, Darcie Wilde. Third in a series of Recency mysteries I started reading last year, which are very fun -- though demerits to the author, or perhaps her publisher, for the fact that A Useful Woman is NOT the first book of the "A Useful Woman" series, though both that series and this one, the "Rosalind Thorne Mysteries," involve the same characters. It's more than a little confusing.

But anyway! The premise here is that Rosalind Thorne is of a good family that (thanks to her father) fell on hard times a while ago, and so she scrapes by kind of being an assistant-slash-fixer to ladies of quality, handling everything from sending dinner party invitations to hushing up minor scandals. Naturally, the series involves her getting involved with rather more large-scale problems, which bring her into contact with both an attractive Bow Street runner and her former suitor, who unexpectedly inherited his family's dukedom and so couldn't possibly wed a gentlewoman teetering on the edge of being utterly fallen.

This is the third volume in the "Rosalinde Thorne Mysteries" series, and as the title suggests, it tangentially involves Lord Byron -- specifically, some indiscreet correspondence with him which has gone missing. (Byron himself does not appear, which I think is probably for the best.) I suspect you could hop into this series wherever you like, but there's no reason not to start at the beginning.

Copper Script, K.J. Charles. I very much enjoyed Death in the Spires and All of Us Murderers, so I went hunting for other books of Charles' that are more mystery than romance, the latter being less my cup of tea. I'm pleased to say that Copper Script breaks from the similarities shared between those other two titles -- not that the similarities were bad, but it was going to start feeling predictable if all of them followed similar beats. This one is likewise set in the early 20th century and involves a m/m romance that has to maneuver around the prejudices and laws of the time, but the main characters (a police officer and a man who, having lost one hand in WWI, now ekes out a living by analyzing handwriting) are not former lovers who had a bad falling-out some time ago, etc. The story this time is also sliiiiiiightly fantastical: the handwriting analysis slips over the line into psychic perception. Apart from that, though, it's a satisfying non-speculative mystery, with police corruption and blackmail and murder.

Some by Virtue Fall, Alexandra Rowland. In one of the months I didn't report on, I read Rowland's A Conspiracy of Truths, which is a very odd book -- the main character spends essentially the entire novel imprisoned or being shuttled between prisons, only able to affect things through the people he talks to. I enjoyed it, though certain things about the ending left a sour taste in my mouth; I'm pleased to see that the sequel may address those things.

But this is not that book! Instead it's a standalone novella (I think in the same world), focused on the cutthroat world of Shakespearean-style theatre in a land where only women, not men, are permitted to act upon the stage. The rivalry between two companies gets wildly out of hand, and mayhem ensues. The main character was slightly difficult for me to empathize with, being very much an "act first think later if ever" kind of person, but I felt it all came together pretty well in the end.

Isabella Nagg and the Pot of Basil, Oliver Darkshire. Straight-up one of my favorite things I've read recently, and also (I am not the first to make this observation) the most Pratchett-esque thing I've read not written by Terry Pratchett.

But that doesn't mean it's just a Discworld knockoff! Darkshire has built a similarly bonkers world -- e.g. the sun beetle does not travel at a steady pace across the sky and sometimes decides to turn around, making the length of a day rather difficult to guess at -- but his leaping-off point is a story from the Decameron, and the overall vibe is much more medieval English smashed into the Romantics (a Goblin Market plays a large role in the story). You'll know if you want to read this one about three pages in; either you vibe instantly with the voice or you don't. I did, and I'm looking forward to the sequel even though the protagonist of that one is a thoroughly unsympathetic antagonist from this book.

Audition for the Fox, Martin Cahill. Novella about a character who needs to win the patronage of one of ninety-nine gods and has already failed with ninety-six of them, so she tries the trickster fox god. Surprise, he throws her a curveball! She winds up in the past, assigned to make sure a key event happens in the revolution that freed her country from the grip of its invaders.

I loved the folkloric interludes here (stories of the Fox and other gods), and the fact that Cahill doesn't have his heroine single-handedly win a war. Her job is merely to facilitate one specific event, which is one of many dominoes whose fall started decades of fighting. Which doesn't make it not important! I love how that part played out. But it's also not One Person Saves The Day, which is very, very good.

The Wordhord: Daily Life in Old English, Hana Videen. I had managed to overlook the subtitle, so I thought this book was primarily about language; turns out it's halfway between that and the kind of daily life book I read on the regular anyway. Videen digs into different aspects of life and looks at the words used back in Anglo-Saxon days, seeing how they do and do not map to the words we use today, and how vocabulary reveals the ways things got categorized and connected and what this means for how people lived. Being a language and culture nerd, naturally I found this right up my alley!

A Letter to the Luminous Deep, Sylvie Cathrall. My other favorite thing I've read recently! I think it's no accident that both this and Isabella Nagg and the Pot of Basil are very quirky in their premises and voice-y in their execution.

Here the voice is Victorian-style letter-writing, and the premise is a world (you're soon able to guess it's a colonized planet) where, thanks to a catastrophe in the distant past, everybody has to eke out a living on an ocean where there's basically only one landmass of anything like meaningful size. Society is organized around Scholars in different fields -- a concept that extends to things like art -- and the main body of the story is the correspondence between a Scholar of Boundless Campus (a fleet of migratory vessels) and a woman who lives a shut-in life in the underwater habitat built by her eccentric Scholar mother. Around that you get a second set of letters between the siblings of those two, who are trying to piece together what led up to the explosion that destroyed the habitat and caused the main characters to disappear.

Cathrall does have to indulge in a bit of contrivance to get the whole story into letters, diaries, or other written documents, and to control the pacing of reveals. But I didn't mind, because it all just felt so original and engaging! This is the first book of a duology, and I promptly ordered the sequel, which is sitting on my desk as I type this.

City of Iron and Ivy, Thomas Kent West. Disclosure: this book was sent to me for blurbing purposes.

Alternate-history fantasy, in an England where floral magic is put to uses both trivial and epic, both fair and foul. The era is essentially Victorian, but West acknowledges in the afterword that he's taken a number of liberties with the period. That includes the Reaper, who is obviously meant to be an analogue to Jack the Ripper (the story starts in 1888), but -- and for me, this was crucial -- is different enough that it didn't trip my very strong opinions about how to handle the historical evidence of those murders.

But it is not entirely a story about murders. Elswyth, a scarred young lady, has to come to London to seek a husband after her more beautiful and sociable sister Persephone disappears, because otherwise she'll have no future and her father's entire estate will go to a loathesome cousin. Only Elswyth is convinced her sister's disappearance has to do with the Reaper, and furthermore that the Reaper is probably a gentleman or noble, so her attempt to navigate that world is cover for her investigation.

I read the whole thing in about a day, and very much appreciated the ways in which the ending eschews some of the easy resolution I anticipated. I don't know if there will be a sequel, but some dangling threads are left for one, while the main plot here resolves just fine.

The Tinder Box, M.R. Carey. Disclosure: this book was also sent to me for blurbing purposes. (I read three such over the holidays, but finished the third after the New Year.)

Labeling this one "historical fantasy" is kind of interesting, because it both is and it isn't. I'd almost call it Ruritanian fantasy, except that term means works set in a secondary world without magic, whereas this is more Ruritanian in the original sense of the word: it takes place in an imaginary European country (circa the late 18th century), and then adds magic to that. If it weren't for a couple of passing references to real places and the fact that Christianity is central to the tale, it could almost be a secondary world.

Anyway, genre labeling isn't the important thing here. The story involves a soldier demobbed from his king's stupid war due to injury, who finds that making a living back home is easier said than done, thanks to the peasantry being squeezed to the breaking point and beyond by said war. He's employed for a time with an unfriendly widow, only for everything to go haywire when a giant devil falls dead out of the sky and the widow, who turns out to be a witch, pays him to loot the body. He pockets one innocuous-seeming item for himself -- a tinder box -- which of course turns out to be exactly what the witch was looking for, and so begins a chase.

I think of this book as being anti-grimdark in kind of the same way I used that term for Rook and Rose: it starts out there, but it doesn't stay there. Mag is living on the edge of starvation and then makes a variety of incredibly stupid decisions in how he uses the tinder box (in fairness, partly due to repeatedly not having time to think things through), while Jannae, the witch, is deeply untrusting of everyone and everything. Meanwhile, the tinder box turns out to contain three trapped devils, and I'm often leery of "deals with the devil" type stories. But I loved the direction Carey took this in, and the ultimate trajectory is toward hope and healing rather than pyrrhic victories. It's a standalone, and absolutely fine that way; you get a complete meal here, without being teased with anything more.

(originally posted at Swan Tower: https://is.gd/TE2qj6)

My First Keeper Song of 2026

Jan. 7th, 2026 04:23 pm
[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

I understand it came out in 2025, mind you. But I’m hearing it for the first time in 2026. It’s a banger. Definitely going into my DJ setlist.

— JS

On the matter of new characters

Jan. 7th, 2026 09:34 am
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
My other group is moving to CoC 3rd edition. That's the one the GM owns. It turns out between the group we own a vast assortment of CoC editions, generally speaking one edition per player, including an original from 1981.

My character, Daniel Soren, has some good stats (Strength, Constitution, Intelligence) and some terrible stats (Dex, Power, and Edu). Unfortunately, in 3E you get Intx5 and Edux15 skill points, so being smart doesn't make up for being a grade school dropout. He does have some decent skills, but very narrowly focused: he's a competent cabbie and a moderately successful pulp writer with ambitions to appear in Weird Tales.

Power governs sanity in CoC so I don't know how long he will last.

Cool

Jan. 7th, 2026 08:59 am
james_davis_nicoll: (Default)
[personal profile] james_davis_nicoll
astrafoxen on blusky created some visual aids showing Saturnian moon orbits.

They're all great but a detail in this one is worth mentioning.



The odd green squiggle to the right is a visual of Neptune's outer irregular moons, whose orbits around Neptune are large enough to be visible across the solar system. https://www.dreamwidth.org/comments/recent

2025 In Review: Part Two

Jan. 7th, 2026 01:00 pm
[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Our Reviewers

Here is the second part of our reviewers’ trawl through 2025. The first part was here. The third will appear on Friday.

Debbie Gascoyne

Death of the Author coverThis has been a terrific year for books, including new books by old favourites that did not disappoint along with new discoveries. In January, I thought it was going to be impossible to beat the impact of Samantha Harvey’s Orbital, the mesmerizing, almost dream-like account of the thoughts and observations of a team of astronauts in the international space station. I don’t think it matters one jot whether it is or is not SF (I’m on the side of it is, kind of, but it’s also almost creative non-fiction if you want to quibble). Another novel that crosses genres and is almost-but-not-quite purely literary is Death of the Author by Nnedi Okorafor, and this was another, like Orbital, that blew the top of my head off. It isn’t often that I find myself muttering “omg this is SO GOOD” as I’m reading. Both books took me places I’ve never been and will likely never go, both made me think about what it means to be human. I do most of my reading via the library these days, but both these books made me want to run out and buy a copy so that I will be able to reread freely. Death of the Author in particular made me want to turn back to the first page and read the whole thing again once I reached the ending.

A runner-up for book of the year is the one I’ve read most lately, it having only just come out in October. That is The Rose Field by Philip Pullman, the eagerly awaited conclusion to The Book of Dust trilogy, bringing to a somewhat ambiguous and open end the story of Lyra Silvertongue and her daemon, Pantalaimon. This was another that I wanted to reread almost immediately, and I also now want to reread the six novels comprising His Dark Materials and The Book of Dust. The combined series links so many ideas and characters; Pullman may be able to keep them all in his head over the thirty years since the publication of the first one, but I can’t. We’ve moved in this latest series from Milton to Spenser and Blake, and from the ills of organized religion to those of late capitalism (although Pullman’s knives are still out for the church). If the socio-political commentary is a little heavy-handed, it somehow feels more necessary and apt in the context of today’s world than thirty years ago.

My favourite YA novel this year was Among Ghosts by Rachel Hartman, a stand-alone but set in the same world as her earlier novels. I’ve enjoyed all Hartman’s books, particularly Tess of the Road, which was one of my favourites the year it came out, but I was particularly impressed with this one. It’s quieter, with fewer topical axes to grind, the structure is sophisticated and subtle, and the characters interesting. It is another that asks all kinds of questions about life and death and identity.

And I haven’t mentioned A Drop of Corruption by Robert Jackson Bennett, or Hemlock and Silver by T. Kingfisher, both of which were terrific. I also reread The Lord of the Rings for the first time in many, many years (and loved it just as much), and did a reread of the Greenwing and Dart series by Victoria Goddard, which is a delight. Yes, there might have been a few disappointments and some books that simply passed the time, but overall this has been a very good reading year, and reading has, thank heavens, taken some of the edge off the otherwise pretty awful real world of 2025.

Dan Hartland

Uncertain Sons coverPerhaps my highlight of 2025 was how hard it proves to pick a highlight of 2025. For example, the year arguably lacked a single “big book” around which the consensus cognoscenti might gather. For various reasons, even weighty candidates for the title such as Okorafor’s Death of the Author, Kuang’s Katabasis, El-Mohtar’s The River has Roots, Tesh’s The Incandescent, or Park’s Luminous seem not quite to have achieved domination in the way other titles have managed in previous years. Even in short fiction, multiple poles existed, including but—in a year characterized by remarkable collections—very much not limited to Debbie Urbanski’s Portalmania and Thomas Ha’s Uncertain Sons. Not only that, but several surprise sleeper hits emerged: from Fellman’s stellar Notes from a Regicide or H. G. Parry’s A Far Better Thing through Alix Harrow’s The Everlasting and Sarah Maria Griffin’s Eat the Ones You Love, it often felt as if books could break out in 2025—that conglomerates and algorithm and AI notwithstanding, word-of-mouth remained a force in shaping if not sales figures then certainly readerly estimation.

This is to be warmly welcomed, as is the sheer range of fronts on which this was happening. Horror, science fiction, and fantasy alike all seemed to be vibrating at creative frequency; publishers not usually associated with these forms published some of their best examples (Faber published Freezing Point, Granta The Expansion Project, New Directions Archipelago of the Sun and so on); new ways of writing in the modes, and indeed avowedly genreless approaches, were common, perhaps definitive. Much gnashing of teeth occasioned the sheer dominance of Romantasy in this year’s SFF sales figures; but it simply cannot be said that this turn is affecting the quality and breadth of fantastical literature being written more broadly. Indeed, the mainstream openness which has powered Romantasy’s entry into generic spaces might have something to do with the vibrancy.

To understand whether that hypothesis holds water, we will need critics—and the further good news is that 2025 saw a sustained flowering of critical spaces in speculative fiction. This was not a new development in the last twelve months, but the fact that 2025 saw no slackening of it is promising. Paul Kincaid’s Colourfields was a major retrospective from an always engaging critic, and therefore an important intervention in the present critical dialogue; but again, there was a great variety of voice, approach, and methodology this year (see Phillips’s Dismantling the Master’s Clock, Roberts’s Fantasy: A Short History, Bacchilega and Greenhill’s Justice in 21st-Century Fairy Tales and the Power of Wonder). Even the Hugo Award for Best Related Work this year went to a piece of criticism, Carroll’s Speculative Whiteness—something is happening, Mr. Jones.

None of this is to say that speculative fiction has across the board arrived at a state of poly-vocal, self-reflexive enlightenment; very obviously not. But it is to say that 2025 was a year in which a certain kind of open-ended, unencumbered approach to the literature became the default at some of its most significant leading edges. Onwards.

Aaron Heil

I read somewhere that most entertainment cycles either through periods of comedy or horror, and my consumption habits in 2025 for film and literature went in opposite directions. I wanted to be transported in time, but not worry about driving the car. My literary sense missed the challenge of running up university libraries’ steps to dip into obscure corners, scrolling Abebooks for that 1950s book of mystery short stories when the library couldn’t find a copy. When I asked my brother his opinion on something I thought he had read—possibly Shutter Island by Dennis Lehane—I described myself as on a “horror kick,” although I realized I’ve been reading horror all year. There’s Shutter Island, of course, but I dipped into A Drink Before the War as well, though that’s a Lehane urban mystery, almost a noir pastiche.

Actually, reading Grady Hendrix’s (much as I love his fiction) nonfiction book, Paperbacks from Hell, on the trends and fads of the industry started the whole thing. Paperbacks from Hell is hilarious, and I will never look at mass market paperbacks the same again. Hendrix has an especially helpfully insight when he points out that so many “mystery” books are horror remarketed. He blames Thomas Harris’s Red Dragon, and justly so, but Red Dragon really does read like a Criminal Minds movie in retrospect. It’s quite easy to see the influence. Along the way, then, I immersed myself in straight, unapologetic noir, working my way through Raymond Chandler’s Marlowe mysteries. Tracking down the movies themselves as been harder, since I’m a skinflint and refuse to simply pay extra for the movie rental. Still, I watched the Farewell, My Lovely adaption, starring Robert Mitchum. Wow, what a weird movie. Robert Mitchum has become my favorite Marlowe. I’m finishing up Davis Grubb’s The Night of the Hunter at present, so maybe it’s more like a Robert Mitchum kick.

At the movies more generally, I just wanted to laugh. Besides Marlowe, and Scorsese’s Shutter Island that I watched soon after finishing the novel, I’ve been searching for some good film comedies. Being jaded about current movies is in fashion, but I really enjoyed The Phoenician Scheme. It’s classic Wes Anderson, understated humor presenting a clear image of a time and place that have gone by, if they ever existed. But that’s the only movie I’ve seen in 2025, released in 2025. Weirdly enough, I’ve been combing the archives for my kicks and giggles. Stripes resurfaced on Netflix and its hilarious. Bill Murray is so young! He, Harold Ramis, and John Candy are new, creative, and innovative even decades later.

More classic still, I’ve tracked down a few Ealing comedies starring Alec Guinness: The Man in the White Suit, and the legendary The Ladykillers. Back in the fifties, comedy could be much sharper and stranger somehow, but the camera does most of the work, focusing in on the ersatz, postwar world that only seems to be holding on by its fingernails while the characters’ absurd conversation carry on with nary a chuckle. What’s also interesting is that The Man in the White Suit presents scientific principles as fiction that really don’t sound implausible. It’s because they’re not anymore, according to IMDB, even if the results don’t match the results of the film. Old comedies, even old science fiction, can apparently carry wisdom forward even into the future.

The hybrid horror book that made me laugh at so many random times that it baffled my wife was Jason Pargin’s 2022 novel, If This Book Exists, You’re in the Wrong Universe. Pargin has previously published books under the pen name David Wong, which he used when writing for Cracked.com. (Remember Cracked.com?!?) It’s the fourth book in the John Dies at the End series, but continuity is for sticklers so just start wherever and enjoy the ride. The humor is random, gory, irreverant, and idiosyncratic. It’s such a strange ride that it’s easy to lose yourself until the next entry comes out in 2026. 

Paul Kincaid

A Granite Silence coverTwo books stand out for me in 2025. Either of them would be unassailed as the best novel of the year at any other time, but here they are together, so I’m not going to choose, just say that each of these is well worth your time. One is A Granite Silence by Nina Allan, an extraordinary work, perhaps the best thing she has written, but not one that fits easily into any recognisable category. It’s a true crime story with a hint of autofiction, but there are elements of the fantastic, and it ends with an extraordinary ghost story that doesn’t read like a ghost story. So, don’t try to identify the genre, just accept that it is brilliant.

The other is more readily identifiable as science fiction, but a narrow genre reading does it no favours. When There Are Wolves Again by E. J. Swift reads like a hopeful counterpart to the coruscating anger of her previous novel, The Coral Bones. But here we are seeing a positive response to climate change over the next few decades in Britain that is an absolute joy to read. Other than those two, do yourself a favour and read City of All Seasons by Oliver K. Langmead and Aliya Whiteley, which is great fun. I also recommend a mainstream novel from 2024, Enlightenment by Sarah Perry, which is full of a scientific sensibility that should appeal to any SF reader with comets, orbits, and gravity shaping the way the characters revolve around each other.

Dean Leetal

Magica Riot coverThis year I went from book slump to book slump. I DNFed left and right. It was hard to concentrate, hard to open up to a story, with everything going on in the world, and particularly in Gaza. I DNFed some genuinely lovely books. Lessons in Magic and Disaster by Charlie Jane Anders was so beautifully poignant that I was unable to finish it. The River Has Roots by Amal El-Mohtar was lyrically and emotionally spellbinding, and I couldn’t put it down till it was just too much. Lucky Day by Chuck Tingle shared such raw grief that I just couldn’t. I hope things get so much better soon that I am able to return and finish these.

A few books did make it through, though. Magica Riot by Kara Buchanan was just perfect, a happy story about a trans magical girl. I also read my first Ali Hazelwood—not my cup of tea but well written. I enjoyed Play Nice by Rachel Harrison, an auto-buy author for me. I was delighted to find out the sequel to Magica Riot, Magica Riot: Full Bloom, was released. I am saving it for the long, lonely days after Hanukkah.

One of my favorite new books that I read this year was Cinder House by Freya Marske. It is a gothic retelling of Cinderella, if Cinderella had been killed and become a ghost. Marske’s writing is, as usual, appealing, to the point, and hard to put down. This year I also started reading books for my PhD. If you somehow missed The Death of Vivek Oji by Akwaeke Emezi, or Sorrowland by Rivers Solomon, do yourself a favor and go back to read them. They are horrifying and beautiful, liminal, and touching.

David Lewis

The Autumn Springs Retirement Home MassacreIt’s been another great year for reading. I wrote gushing reviews of Philip Fracassi’s The Autumn Springs Retirement Home Massacre and Alexandria Faulkenbury’s debut novel Somewhere Past the End. But those aren’t the only noteworthy books I read this year.

Since Detransition, Baby I’d been raving about Torrey Peters, and her genre-crossing collection, Stag Dance, was one of my 2025 highlights. One of the things I love about her characters is that nobody (trans, cis, or undefined) is fully a victim or an oppressor. They’re messy and uncertain, not easy characters to write about clearly. Yet, whether in dystopian futures or a nineteenth-century logging camp, Peters does so in elegant and moving prose.

Sarah Maria Griffin’s botanical horror novel, Eat the Ones You Love, didn’t grow out of Ireland’s green fields, rather one of its many half-abandoned shopping centers. When Shell starts working in the Woodbine Crown mall, she doesn’t realize that her beautiful boss is the caretaker of a monstrous, sentient plant that’s always hungry. This Hiberno Shop of Horrors takes a look at relationships, consumerism, and even the housing crisis in modern Ireland while remaining a fun and creepy read.

My favorite of the year is Stephen Graham Jones’s The Buffalo Hunter Hunter. Spanning three centuries, this novel confronts the US federal government’s history of terrorism and genocide of Native Americans through the story of a Blackfeet vampire. An (un)holy trinity of elegant writing, a captivating narrative, and an important history, this is a horror masterpiece.

In a decolonizing vein, favorites from my catch-up reading are LeAnne Howe’s 2001 Choctaw epic, Shell Shaker, and Andrea Rogers’ 2022 Cherokee gothic collection, Man Made Monsters. Both books feature characters from pre-Trail of Tears to present times; the monsters and spirits they encounter sometimes lead them to safety, sometimes to death.

Dawn Macdonald

Supergiants coverMy husband and I have a routine of reading out loud to each other, taking turns in the evenings, and lately we’ve been working through Anthony C. Yu’s four-volume 1980s translation of the sixteenth-century Chinese epic Journey to the West, attributed to Wu Cheng’en. As the tale progresses, I have to ask—is this the progenitor text to The Wizard of Oz? We’ve got a naïve hero with three magical helpers each representing an aspect of the self, plus a non-speaking animal companion, on a lengthy foot journey in pursuit of a boon that could have been delivered at any point, but the trials of the task are deemed necessary to its attainment. It’s easy to see why this story has been a popular favorite for hundreds of years. Anyway, should you ever decide to undertake your own oral recitation, my pro tip is to do the character Chu Pa-chieh with a countrified accent, Sha Monk with a snooty British accent, and the various fiends as New York mobsters.

2025 has also been a good year for speculative poetry. Here I’d like to highlight Kyle Flemmer’s wildly experimental, space-themed collection Supergiants, Gary Jackson’s Afrofuturist “graphic novel in verse” small lives, and Mahaila Smith’s dystopian-but-hopeful Seed Beetle. (Full disclosure: I know Mahaila slightly and have published in a journal they co-edit.) It’s also the year I discovered R. Kolewe’s 2021 book-length poem The Absence of Zero, which blends lines from Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler’s classic textbook Gravitation with T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets and bits of the poet’s own brain. Each one of these books will gently take your mind apart and hand it back to you transformed. 

Paul March-Russell

To be honest, I’ve watched more films than read novels that were released in 2025. In saying that, I’m omitting the books published by Gold SF (The Mune, The Path of Most Resistance, Maybe the Birds) with which I’ve had more than a hand. The reading of manuscripts, the editing of articles, the occasional review … they all tend to distract from the newly published. The Clarke Award is a chance to catch up and at least sound as if I’m in step with the contemporary.

But I’m not, always lagging behind. If I dwell upon novels of the past, and upon works that have little or nothing to do with SF—notable texts this year include The Bloater, The Hearing Trumpet, and The War Between the Tates—then at least I can claim I’m reading to enhance my sense of perspective. Any disingenuity is offset by the fact that nearly all the fiction I read these days is by women. I will, of course, be interested to see what China Miéville’s new novel is like. But with the exception of a few writers (M. John Harrison, Jon McGregor, David Mitchell, Max Porter), I doubt whether I have any interest left for the words of a living male author.

Nonetheless, amongst the non-fiction books that impressed me the most were Jim Endersby’s The Arrival of the Fittest, an extraordinary re-evaluation of the biological sciences during the early twentieth century, and Horatio Clare’s We Came by Sea, an inspirational reassessment not only of the so-called migrant crisis but also British values of inclusivity and hospitality. To these I would add Robert Macfarlane’s Is a River Alive? and Jenn Ashworth’s The Parallel Path.

But the most surprising thing this year was Alex Garland’s screenplay for 28 Years Later. I’ve never much cared for Garland’s writing. But amidst the visceral horror—it’s a zombie movie, after all—there were lengthy and poignant passages about love and landscape, grief and mourning, community and mortality. Several parts Patrick Ness’s A Monster Calls, with a dash of Russell Hoban’s Riddley Walker, it was an unexpectedly mature piece with which to awaken the undead of a seemingly moribund franchise.

Marisa Mercurio

The Bog Wife coverMy library holds list forced me to drop almost everything but reading in August, when eight novels came in at once. It was a rush to a four-week finish line. I could enumerate the new releases I loved this year (many of which I indeed read in August), including Fresh, Green Life by Sebastian Castillo, The Bog Wife by Kay Chronister, and Victorian Psycho by Virginia Feito, and chart-toppers like The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones and We Do Not Part by Han Kang. My favorite novel of the year, however, is backlist: Orlanda by Jacqueline Harpman. Known best in the English-speaking world for I Who Have Never Known Men, a French-language science fiction novel, Harpman was a prolific author and psychoanalyst whose careers beautifully synchronize in Orlanda. The 1996 novel opens in Paris’s Gard du Nord with timid literature professor Aline struggling to read Virgina Woolf’s Orlando. When she sees a beautiful young man also waiting in the train station, a shard of her soul—the part housing the tomboy Aline was before it was dampened—splits off and takes over his body. This shard adopts the feminized name Orlanda while using he/him pronouns to honor the genderqueer facets of his bodymind. The world reopens for Orlanda. He cruises; he shrugs off responsibilities; he laughs often. This is one of those introspective take-stock-of-your-life novels that I love to read around the New Year, and which celebrates the spectrum within the individual.

Cameron Miguel

A Far Better Thing cover2025’s tumultuous nature cleared and required space for literary reprieve. I sought refuge from my trials and anxieties between the covers of so many terrific stories, amid fires and floods and government attacks against my community. Perhaps I’m Nero, reading while Los Angeles burns. But, facing near-insurmountable odds, reading is the key to community action and awareness.

Reviewing with Strange Horizons has rekindled my analytical passions, sharpened my authorial instincts, and introduced me to many authors I’ll read in subsequent years. Applying to several Creative Writing MFA programs colored my annual reading experience and what impacted me most. I turned the pages of many literary and speculative novels and had my fill of audiobooks.

I resonated with the traumas of Hal Lancaster in Allen Bratton’s Henry, Henry; yearned for love amid suspense with Carys Davies’s Clear; and was left in shambles by John Boyne’s The Absolutist. I reconnected with literary classics such as Baldwin through Giovanni’s Room, Le Guin through an audiobook of The Left Hand of Darkness; and Forster, whose Maurice I devoured in a day while getting my car serviced. I met H. G. Perry through A Far Better Thing, K. J. Parker through Making History, and Jonathan Parks-Ramage through It’s Not the End of the World. While earlier novels have more optimism (overall) compared to contemporary novels, the note of heartache threaded through each novel remains on my mind. Sometimes it’s loud as an organ, as in The Absolutist; other times it’s mellow, as in Making History.

I’m grateful for the platform Strange Horizons has given me to share my thoughts, and for the novels I’ve read this year that changed the way I view the world. I look forward to continuing in my role, especially with so many upcoming releases in 2026.

Anushree Nande

Exit Zero cover2025 was a year of the novella and short stories (The Wayward Children by Seanan McGuire, The Knight and the Butcherbird by Alix Harrow, catching up on Nghi Vo’s Singing Hills Cycle series), the year of repeat comfort authors and series (The Geographer’s Map to Romance by India Holton, Emily Wilde’s Compendium of Lost Tales by Heather Fawcett, Brigands and Breadknives by Travis Baldree) and the year I discovered cozy sci-fi courtesy Becky Chambers (her Monk and Robot novellas kickstarted the year for me, the perfect entry point to a genre at large that has always felt rather intimidating; The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet expanded upon that first very positive experience, and I’m now looking ahead with anticipation). Speaking of SFF, I also read and enjoyed the stories by my fellow anthology cohort for volume 1 of the IF anthology of new Indian SFF (Westland Books), which skews in favour of sci-fi.

Moving on to new releases. Marie-Helene Bertino’s Beautyland was a surprise 2024 favourite, so I was highly anticipating short story collection Exit Zero, which became my first review for Strange Horizons. The other one I reviewed for SH was H. G. Parry’s captivating, expansive portal fantasy take on A Tale of Two Cities. I now have my eye on her backlist for next year, even as I look ahead to her new release. In Tashan Mehta’s headily, cosmically, imaginative Mad Sisters of Esi (a 2023 release for India, but a 2025 one for the US) and Alix Harrow’s stunning ourobouros, The Everlasting, I found two breathtaking, sweeping, life-altering stories I know I’ll be returning to.

A year, then, of thinking about the nature of stories, how and why they matter; about identity, memory, community, fighting for safer spaces, and radical hope.

Jacqueline Nyathi

Esperance cover223 books in 2025 (the year isn’t over), but I wasn’t on top of things, and blame the person who persuaded me it was ok to read more than one book at a time. I think, though, this in Bad Indians Book Club by Patty Krawec (still unfinished) vindicates me: “[L]ayering fiction with non-fiction, or setting conversational books alongside more academic material … [p]uts the books into conversation with each other, which leads to new ideas or ways of understanding the topics, other ways of reading and understanding familiar texts.”

I always gravitate toward hard SF but I enjoyed SFF in general (excellent collections from Thomas Ha, Vanessa Fogg, Carla E. Dash, Gareth Powell, two Blaft anthologies, the Nebula Awards Showcase 60, the Year’s Best Canadian Fantasy and Science Fiction, Volume 2, and novels from JP Nebra and Jane Mondrup). In translated fiction, I recommend All That Dies in April by Mariana Travacio (tr. Samantha Schnee and Will Morningstar) and Río Muerto by Ricardo Silva Romero (tr. Victor Meadowcraft). I found non-fiction essay collections compelling (Jamaica Kincaid, Lavinia Greenlaw’s The Vast Extent, Trace Press’s River in an Ocean). Other favourite non-fiction: How to Kill a Witch by Zoe Venditozzi and Claire Mitchell (read it!), Decolonizing Language and Other Revolutionary Ideas by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, The Two Princes of Mpfumo by Lindsay O’Neill, Moshtari Hilal’s Ugliness, Kate Loveman’s The Strange History of Samuel Pepys’s Diary, and Howard W. French’s The Second Emancipation. In African lit I loved Oyinkan Braithwaite’s Cursed Daughters, Adam Oyebanji’s Esperance, Will This Be A Problem? Issue V, Chido Muchemwa’s Who Will Bury You? And Other Stories, and enjoyed the ZamaShort series. And the book that made me cackle is Richard Martin’s I Inherited a Mixed Animal from Uncle Living in Woods.

My recency bias is due to reading a tonne of ARCs, which I’m somewhat regretful about as I don’t get round to other stuff I’m interested in. I joined a (virtual) book club to counter this a bit, but I can’t always make the time.

Roseanna Pendlebury

When There Are Wolves Again cover2025 was simply too full. Too many books I warmly anticipated, too many good books I hadn’t expected, too many books as yet unread but so well reviewed they call out to be picked up and read as soon as possible.

Hard to find any pattern in the multitude, but a few specific points call out to be remembered. Notes from a Regicide by Isaac Fellman was my standout, much anticipated and even more beloved of the year. He remains the author in SFF right now I think best able to engender awe and wonder in the reader, while managing to keep the same work fully grounded in the realities of being human. His books feel, and that is so valuable to me.

Much of the rest of my bests and beloveds echo that need for feeling—hope in Syr Hayati Beker’s What a Fish Looks Like, which finds community in a time that feels like the end of everything; determination in Lara Elena Donnelly’s No Such Thing as Duty, coupled with a deeply realistic self-doubt; the slipperiness of belief in Natalia Theodoridou’s Sour Cherry; onto more complex, layered emotional reactions to the long tail of trauma in The Place of Shells by Mai Ishizawa, translated by Polly Barton.

But the most unexpected was When There Are Wolves Again by E. J. Swift, in which she joins an unlikely optimism that all is not lost, ecologically, in the future with a despair that that possibility might nonetheless be lost by inaction. Much of its power comes from how plausible her vision of that slightly better future is, how real the steps to reach it. That cocktail of fragile hope and realism was a heady one, one I know will stick with me into the future, whatever that might be.


Yaybahar III Nadiri [music]

Jan. 6th, 2026 07:27 pm
siderea: (Default)
[personal profile] siderea
2026 Jan 6: Görkem Şen (Yaybahar on YT): Yaybahar III Nadiri



The description text:
The essence of gold was rare, he conquered with his virtue, offered his gifts and fell behind the sun...

Dedicated to the soul of my dear friend's father, Nadir Oğuz...
I am surmising that "Nadiri" means "Of Nadir". Yaybahar is the instrument, the artist is its inventor:
The name yaybahar (pronounced /jajba'har/) has Turkish origin. It is a composite of two words: yay means a "string" or a "coiled string" and bahar means the season "spring." According to Gorkem Sen, the name is derived from the idea of a new life or a new beginning. [1]
I assume this is the third one of its kind the artist has made.

Artist's website: https://www.gorkemsen.com/

The Big Idea: Nicole Glover

Jan. 6th, 2026 07:09 pm
[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by Athena Scalzi

When you find there to be a lack of magic in your world, make a new one. That’s exactly what author Nicole Glover set out to do when crafting the whimsical world of her newest novel, The Starseekers. Come along in her Big Idea to see how the ordinary can be made just a little more magical.

NICOLE GLOVER:

I always found it a severe disappointment when I realized as a child that I was living in a world where tea pots weren’t enchanted, ravens didn’t linger on fence posts to give me a quest, and that dragons weren’t snoring away in caves. I didn’t need unicorns or griffins as pets and I never had the urge climb a beanstalk, I just wanted a touch more wonder in the world. 

So I did the only thing any reasonable person can do: I started writing fantasy.

From riffs on fairy tales, to tales of travelers seeking a library hidden in a desert oasis, to my current series, in my stories I explored what a world could look like with an abundance of magic. 

And with each story I found myself most intrigued by the quieter uses of magic.

The spells in my stories warmed boots, provided a bobbing light for the overeager reader trying to read one last chapter, or put up the groceries for a weary shopper. I found joy in writing about enchantments that made tea kettles bubble with daydreams or devising cocktails that made a drinker recall their greatest regrets.  The magic in my stories didn’t include epic quests and battles,  and if there were curses, they probably had more in common with jinxes and weren’t nearly as difficult to untangle.

Everyday magic, is the word I like to use for it. Such magic is small spells and charms, that are simple enough for anyone to use and often have many different uses.  In contrast to Grand magic which are spells that only a few can ever learn because they are dangerous, and just do one thing really well and nothing else.

Magic that’s in the background, in my opinion, is more useful than Grand spells that could remake the world. (After all what’s the use of a sword that’s only good for slaying the Undead Evil Lord, when the rest of the time it’s just there collecting dust in a corner?) Grand magic is clunky and troublesome, and can be like using a blowtorch when a pair of scissors is all that is needed. You ruin everything and don’t accomplish what you needed to do in the first place. It’s also very straight forward as the magic leaves little wiggle for variation or adjustment without catastrophe. And if a writer isn’t careful, duels involving magic can easily devolve into “wizards flinging balls of magical energy at each other.”

Magics with a smaller scale, leaves room for exploration. It can even allow you to be clever and to think hard of how it animates objects, impacts the environment, creates illusions, or even transforms an unruly apprentice into a fox. Most importantly, Everyday magic are the spells and enchantments that everyone can use, instead of magic being restricted to few learned scholars (or even forbidden). 

Everyday magic allows a prankster to have fun, a child could get even on the bully, let’s an overworked city employee easily transform a park, and have new parents be assured their baby in snug in their crib. 

It’s also the sort of magic perfect for solving mysteries. 

The world of The Starseekers, runs on Everyday magic. I filled the pages with magic that creates staircases out of books, enchant inks and cards,  brings unexpected utility to a compass, lends protection spells to bracelets, and even store up several useful spells in parasols. There is an air of whimsy to Everyday magic, giving me flexibility to have it suit my needs. Magic seeps into the surroundings, informing how characters move through the world and how they think about their acts. It allows me to consider the magical solutions to get astronauts to the Moon, how a museum may catalogue their collection of magical artifacts, or what laws on wands and broomsticks might arise and if those laws are just or not. 

Embracing Everyday magic is what made The Starseekers possible, because making the everyday extraordinary is one of the many things I aim for as a writer and a lover of magic.


The Starseekers: Amazon|Barnes & Noble|Books-a-Million|Bookshop|Powell’s

Author socials: Website|Instagram|Bluesky|Threads

duskpeterson: The lowercased letters D and P, joined together (Default)
[personal profile] duskpeterson

Most travellers to the Emorian borderland take the opportunity to visit the capital of Emor, located immediately north of the borderland.

With walls higher and thicker than those of any other city in the Three Lands, Emor's capital looks from the outside to be a garrisoned fort. This appearance is deceptive. Once you pass through the heavily guarded gates, you will find yourself in a bustling city, full of trade and games.

My strong advice is that your first task should be to find a place to stay. The capital's inns are crowded year-round; the more crowded they are, the higher the prices they charge. If it is at all possible, see whether you can find an acquaintance to stay with – though I'm bound to say that the capital's residents are so used to "friends" showing up at their homes without notice that many of them now charge boarding fees almost as high as those charged by the inns.

You could easily spend a year perusing all the sights in Emor. I can only touch on a few of them here.


[Translator's note: The gates to Emor's capital feature in a spiritual vision in Death Mask.]

[syndicated profile] bruce_schneier_feed

Posted by Bruce Schneier

We don’t have many details:

President Donald Trump suggested Saturday that the U.S. used cyberattacks or other technical capabilities to cut power off in Caracas during strikes on the Venezuelan capital that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

If true, it would mark one of the most public uses of U.S. cyber power against another nation in recent memory. These operations are typically highly classified, and the U.S. is considered one of the most advanced nations in cyberspace operations globally.

Profile

ashnistrike: (Default)
ashnistrike

January 2019

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 12:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios