Someone left my cake out in the raid

Jul. 8th, 2025 06:58 pm
[syndicated profile] slacktivist_feed

Posted by Fred Clark

It's weird to blog about wtiches and ghost stories and batnados during the rise of a police state, but keeping room for wonder and whimsy and weird interests is part of how we resist the rise of a police state.

Sex Lizard

Jul. 8th, 2025 11:00 am
[syndicated profile] savagelove_feed

Posted by Nancy Hartunian

A queer woman has a non-binary, AFAB spouse. Her partner can mime the action of cunnilingus with their tongue, flicking and teasing across the dinner table, like a horny lizard. The caller wishes she could do the same, but her tongue just doesn’t work that way. She also gets low marks on her oral technique, … Read More »

The post Sex Lizard appeared first on Dan Savage.

Fear of Fairing

Jul. 8th, 2025 11:00 am
[syndicated profile] savagelove_feed

Posted by Patrick Kearney

I’m a 44-year-old woman with a history of childhood sexual trauma. I enjoy sex if I’m with a partner I feel very connected to emotionally, but I’ve never had an orgasm. Because of this I tend to rely on pleasing my partner during sex rather than my own arousal. It works OK for me at … Read More »

The post Fear of Fairing appeared first on Dan Savage.

[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Fernanda Coutinho Teixeira

This review is part of a special week of pieces here at Strange Horizons which focus on speculative fiction in translation published by US small presses. These publishers are being impacted by the Trump administration's recent revocation of a number of grants made by the National Endowment of the Arts. Rachel Cordasco has compiled a list of works appearing in recent years from these houses. The health and breadth of speculative fiction relies on the work of these presses. Please support them and their work.

Ultramarine is published in the US by Deep Vellum.

*

Ultramarine coverUltramarine, Mariette Navarro’s 2024 novella, is a story shaped by emotions and reflections—images and language that flow at a smooth pace through a waving, surreal journey. Translated from French by Eve Hill-Agnus in 2025, the story, set in the modern age but with no clear date, follows a ship captain and her crew. Usually ruled by a strict routine, one day the sailors ask the captain to stop the ship to allow them to dive into and swim in the ocean for a bit. The captain agrees, though she doesn’t participate. The experience proves transformative in more ways than one: Previously a group of twenty men, once the sailors return they’re suddenly twenty-one. No matter how many times the characters count, there’s still one extra person on the ship, although no one can exactly identify who that is.

This is the setup for an uncanny, introspective story led by the ship’s captain, a nameless woman more comfortable at sea than on land. Efficient and practical, she is just as surprised as anyone when she agrees to the sailors’ request for a swim break:

She, who is always so careful about this, notices as she says the word that it has not had time to come from her stomach. It was born directly in her throat and hatched publicly: “Alright.” So, if her voice has spoken, she can only follow, as she is not in the habit of disagreeing with herself.

As the book’s opening scene, this moment sets the stage for the narrative to follow, in which characters’ bodies and minds sometimes find themselves at odds, as if outside forces are acting upon them for unknown reasons. There’s been a shift in something around the crew, and although they can’t pinpoint exactly what it was, their behavior transforms accordingly.

These outside forces are deeply connected to the environment. Ultramarine embraces the notion of the open sea as almost a different dimension, a place where both sailors and captain must understand themselves as something beyond the confines of earthly concepts. As the novella’s refrain, established in a brief prologue, goes: “[T]here are the living, the dead, and the sailors.” The sailors, those at sea, exist in their own category, and part of the narrative is their coping with this newly shaped existence and how it interacts with who they are on land. This goes double for the captain, who is separated from the rest of the crew by her position and her demeanor—she does not join the sailors in the infamous diving stop, but it affects her all the same.

Navarro’s prose, as rendered in Hill-Angus’s translation, proves essential for the flow of the narration to work. The language is simple but unafraid of the abstract, rich with feeling but never sentimental. The description of the sailors’ swim is perhaps the peak of this style, as the wavering of their senses of self never ceases to feel deeply intimate:

They dive one or two meters deep, hear their hearts beating in their temples, grasp another kind of silence. They’ve left the sounds of the earth and of the surface: they discover the music of their own blood, a drumming to the point of jubilation, percussion that could lead them to a trance. Dark sound of held breaths, symphony of lightness.

There is a lovely simplicity in the word choices, but also an airy quality given to these men’s identities as they alternately perceive themselves as one big unit, or profoundly alone. The swimming is both a moment of bonding and embrace, and of exposure to the sea’s unfathomable strength and depth. They “befriend death without crossing its border.”

But what about the return, with the mysterious new presence between them? The transition between spaces, between the ocean and the ship, suggests a mangling, a distortion of this collective identity, which creates a sense of tension and dread that permeates the entire story. It’s not quite horror, but there is a distinct discomfort in the idea of something minor being irrevocably out of place, an impossible-to-pin-down, newfound presence that irremediably alters a previously solid, reliable existence. The question isn’t about who or what has come into the ship, but about the way the addition alters everyone’s sense of safety. This uneasy feeling underlies each character’s every post-dive move.

This unease is exacerbated by the isolation inherent in the crew’s profession. This is particularly important for the captain: “She remembers that it’s never easy. That you don’t go from one category to another, as if from death to life, without losing some of your bearings and flexibility. She knows you’re not always welcome on the ocean’s back, that you can’t cling to its mane with impunity.” The animalization of the ocean in this passage is not unique—the ship, too, is perceived as a live entity, with a heart to which the captain attempts to reach out. Continuously, there is the sense of these characters as small beings in the hands of larger, more powerful creatures, fighting to cling to their own selves as their vulnerability becomes more and more obvious.

Even so, Ultramarine is not a pessimistic narrative. Throughout the novella, the theme of connection found in isolation comes up several times, a small glimpse of hope in the surreal landscape of trepidation.

There is, of course, the profound connection established between the sailors during their swim:

They call one another by their first names now, shout out to and congratulate each other. They feel affection for this one’s reddened skin, that suntan, that strand of tousled blond hair coming out of the water. […] They marvel over a perfect, round ear they’d never noticed before, would like to run their fingers through the wet hair of a sailor whose name they don’t even know, and to embrace each other—to say, today, that they love each other with a true love, with a crazy love, and who cares about the lovers left at port?

This is a connection the captain doesn’t share, a “silence that [isn’t] hers.” Rule-minded and efficient, she attempts to handle the situation with logic: She checks each sailor’s papers to try to find the intruder, fixates on one blond boy who seems to be the odd one out. Her strategies aren’t enough to face the issue. She is wrestling with her own loneliness and grief; only facing such feelings head-on can give her a chance to pull through them. She must resist her “exasperating habit of taking in the world from a soaring height.” She must dare to come closer.

Admirably, Ultramarine resists the notion of providing the reader with clear-cut, straightforward explanations for its slightly mythical, creepy elements. It’s a book that knows it thrives in sensation, not in structure. It is a brief but memorable read that feels precise and intentional in its handling of its themes. In embracing its fluidity, the novella creates an immersive, emotional experience for a reader willing to dive into its mixture of yearning, fear, and loneliness.


[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Will McMahon

This review is part of a special week of pieces here at Strange Horizons which focus on speculative fiction in translation published by US small presses. These publishers are being impacted by the Trump administration's recent revocation of a number of grants made by the National Endowment of the Arts. Rachel Cordasco has compiled a list of works appearing in recent years from these houses. The health and breadth of speculative fiction relies on the work of these presses. Please support them and their work.

The Fake Muse is published in the US by Open Letter.

*

The Fake Muse coverThe Fake Muse is one hell of a ride. Metatextual, stylistically dexterous, and formally deviant, Max Besora’s second book published in English (translated from the Catalan by Mara Faye Lethem for Open Letter) is the rare novel that feels genuinely novel.

Structurally, the book is divided into three parts of unequal length. The first, and longest, “Welcome to the V@lley of the Bronx!,” is a series of first-person introductions to a bizarre cast of characters living in and around New Barcelona, which is situated in the titular “Valley of the Bronx.” Written with a minimum of capitalization or punctuation, each chapter begins with a given character introducing themselves in an at first uniformly shallow and casual tone, sharing their name, zodiac sign, and biographical details before descending into increasingly absurd and violent acts.

A man transforms into a vampire to punish a distracting moviegoer. A model falls in love with a giant hamster who speaks in famous quotations, shoots lasers from his eyes, and leads a global animal liberation movement. A man psychologically plagued by his baldness finds a cure that works too well, becoming “the kingkong of the bronx.” A criminal is captured by a gang of female Nazi Satanists, who turn him into a sexual slave of the “Hitlerian matriarchy.” A detective inspector obsessed with the esoteric power of numbers keeps tabs on it all.

If there is a thread running through this chaos, it is in the Holofernes family—older sister Amanda (seventeen years old; Scorpio), younger sister Isabel II (thirteen; Libra), father Javier (fifty-five; Leo), mother Leonor (forty-eight; Taurus), and dog Molecule (three; Gemini)—each of whom are introduced in their own chapter. Their stories intersect occasionally with those of the other characters’ (e.g., the family dog Molecule is inspired to bite off Mrs. Holofernes’s nose by the hamster Manuel’s animal liberation manifesto), but these five chapters form the most coherent narrative in the first part of the novel.

In the opening chapter, Amanda is raped nightly by her father, whom she depicts as a tentacled monster. The following stories get wilder and more detached from reality as they go; however, a thematic link between sexuality and monstrosity emerges again and again, so that all of the dark absurdity can be read as attempts to process the sadly very realistic horror experienced by this girl. Another recurring theme, the link between animal agriculture and the treatment of women, also clearly emerges.

The language in Amanda’s chapter retains a colloquial character throughout but comes into focus as she expresses her rage, in evocative images of flaming chasms and sharpened knives. The text is littered with skull-and-crossbones symbols, which eventually take over the chapter’s final page, as Amanda disassociates from her identity and becomes “mandyjane deathlove.” And throughout the novel, the actual words tell only part of the story. Various symbols, icons, photographs (often described as being posted on Instagram, fitting with the internet-fueled language), visual effects, advertisements, newspapers, and more break up the text, which itself fragments across the page to indicate obsession or madness or the cessation of consciousness in death.

The frequent visual aids, ranging from a Christmas tree to a hamster shooting lasers from its eyes to a woman with her pubic hair shaved into a swastika, seem less intended to provide new or different information from what is in the text than to serve as emphasis or punctuation. An overwhelming sense emerges that the author must have had a great time putting it all together. And it is indeed impossible not to speak of the author very specifically when discussing this novel: The metatextual turn of the final two parts is presaged by the fact that, in and among these introductions to his fictional characters, Max Besora (forty years old; Aquarius) claims his own chapter. In it, he first verbally and then physically grapples with an “important critic/writer/prize juror/very locally famous commentator” who takes the dim view that literature is a product like any other and that authors should be active on social media. (The present critic takes the warning to heart.)

The novel’s second part, “Mandyjane Gets Her Revenge,” is written as a farcical stage play, bringing together most of the characters previously introduced into a single narrative. The interior perspectives of the first part are jettisoned for an almost totally exterior view built on dialogue and stage directions. This breaks down significantly, however, when Amanda/Mandyjane narrates a sexual encounter with Johnny the Vampire in graphic detail, concluding that “I’m a woman, can’t you see what I am, what they’ve made me into? Because all this is about suffering.”

Mandyjane and Johnny go on to plot the murder of the Holofernes parents, while Detective Inspector Thadeus and his policemen pursue them in the blended tones of a slapstick noir. Throughout, the script’s dialogue is over-the-top dramatic, expository, cryptic, and expressive—a soap opera plunging into the absurd. Pronouncements seemingly weighted with meaning break down into the meaningless, as when Javier, the father Holofernes, declares, “The day will come when there are no fathers left, no mothers left no left no flamingos left no recognizable music left.” (It doesn’t make much more sense in context.) Eventually, the text itself breaks down into two pages of blurred lines, the script’s conclusion replaced by a three-panel comic of black-and-white photos.

This leads into the final section, “The Fake Muse,” which takes the form of a dialogue in which Mandyjane interrogates her “capricious demiurge” of an author, Max Besora, at gunpoint about why he would write such horrors for her. Here, the earlier reading of the text as metaphor is dissected, with Mandyjane proclaiming, “Now I can transcend the historical and patriarchal limitations of my natural fictional condition, and divert the recursive structures of my thoughts of my traumatic past.”

In the earlier “Max” chapter, the fictionalized Besora—who has just, for example, depicted a thirteen-year-old girl being groomed online by someone with the screenname “Marquis de Sade 3000”—defends his work by “[making] it clear that i wasn’t a psychopath or a rapist or an abuser BUT MY CHARACTERS WERE and that only the lame-brained confuse the narrator with the author at this stage of the game.” (Tell that to Twitter.) But in this final section, Mandyjane critiques Besora for playing into stereotypes of abused women seeking revenge. Here the real-world author risks being a little too clever in his metatextual conceit. As the argument proceeds, the layers of attack and defense accumulate in such a way as to almost be designed to give Besora an out on any possible criticism. “No, look, I’m not really serious,” he seems to be saying, which risks undercutting the ability of the work to say anything at all.

Besora escapes this trap by dialing up the self-mockery. As shatter marks begin to visually consume the final pages, a sexually humiliated Max Besora is bound and whipped by Mandyjane while loudly proclaiming himself to be a good male feminist, clearly getting off on his own degradation. As the unreadable text falls away, this scene is helpfully illustrated by black-and-white photo cutouts.

Questions of the artistic legitimacy of graphic content are left unanswered, except by the existence of the work itself. For all the incorporation of serious subject matter, both the earlier encounter with the “important critic/writer/prize juror/very locally famous commentator” and, ultimately, the subjugation of the author to his character seem to send a lighter message: Art breaks down when examined too closely, so you might as well enjoy the ride.


[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

It’s 1987 and my friend Tommy Kim has an idea to make his college applications stand out from the crowd: In addition to the usual essays, grades and test scores, he’s going to include a cassette of songs he’s written, performed by a band he put together, and professionally produced in an actual studio. The band he put together included a bunch of friends and schoolmates, including me on drums and my pal Kevin Stampfl on bass. Our name: Dead Rats Don’t Fly, or “DRDF” for short. Why did we call ourselves that? Look, pal, it was the 80s, okay. Lots of things didn’t make sense. The four-song EP we cranked out in two days of studio time was called 327, named after Tommy’s room number in the Holt dormitory at Webb.

So, how was 327 as musical statement? Well, it is exactly the music that you’d expect from a bunch of rock-loving 80s teenage dudes of varying musical abilities hastily tossed together into a band with only two days of studio time at their disposal. Are the songs… good? With all love: No. In the performances, can you sense primordial musical talent waiting for its moment to arrive? Also no. Could the drummer keep a beat without speeding up? I mean, sometimes? Tommy did get into college at least one place, so it did what it was supposed to do. Otherwise, it’s a kind of a mess.

But I think it’s an endearing mess, and at the time, waaaaay back in 1987, when we got our band copies of the EP (on cassette! It was the 80s!), we thought it was pretty damn cool. Kevin and I drove around in his Mustang, listening to the thing, kind of dazed that we had actually been in a studio, and that music we made had been committed to a permanent medium. 327 isn’t exactly good, but 17-year-old me was still proud of it, and I had a blast playing songs with my friends. And that was a good thing.

(It also allowed me to play a great prank: when Steve Shenbaum, one of the singers — yes, we had two — arrived at Northwestern for his freshman orientation and met his dorm’s resident assistant, the RA said “Steve Shenbaum? Of DRDF? Dude, that’s my favorite band!” and all the upperclassmen in the dorm were able to recite the EP’s lyrics to him. He was amazed, as he recounted to me a couple days later when I called him to see how his college experience was shaping up, and eventually it was my giggling into the phone as he told me about it that revealed that I had called his RA a day before he showed up to set the bait for him. It was delightful. I believe Steve has forgiven me. Probably.)

I misplaced my 327 tape years ago, and of course these days I don’t have a cassette player anyway, and for years the EP passed into myth, and then into legend (for, like, the extremely limited number of people who know the band members and/or ever heard the cassette or heard DRDF play live at our single concert). Then a few years ago Steve sent me an MP3 rip of his cassette of 327 (see? I told you he’s forgiven me!) and I had it again. I listened to it! It was still terrible! Nevertheless I took one of the songs from it, called “It’s a New Reality” (I wrote the lyrics for it, you see), cleaned it up slightly with Logic Pro, and put it up on YouTube. A fun, or at least nostalgic, time was had by the 1.6k people who listened to it since I posted it.

But what of the rest of 327? Well, it’s a few years later now, I’m somewhat more proficient at musical production, and music recovery tools are better these days, so you know what? Fuck it, I’ve gone back and rehabbed the entire EP now. I went in, stemmed out the vocals, drums and other instruments, cleaned and brightened them, moved around some of the bum notes to get them (mostly) on key, sonically painted over the clicks where I hit my drumsticks together, and in one place patched a place in the recording where a tape head clearly jammed up, leaving a blank space in a song, pasting in the keyboards and adding a bridge vocal.

The cleanup has reveal 327 as a minor classi — no, actually it hasn’t, it’s still a bunch of 80s kids bashing together tunes on a tight schedule with more enthusiasm than actual talent (well, the guitarist, a ringer Tommy brought in named George Huang, was actually talented; he was our age but had clearly been playing for years. The rest of us? Hey, we tried!). Also, it wouldn’t have done to try to erase every artifact of its 80s amateurishness, and I’m not that good an engineer anyway, so there’s still tape hiss (and lossy MP3 simmerwarble), compressed dynamics, variable tempos and other evidence that what you’re hearing was hauled up from the subterranean depths of four decades ago. Don’t kid yourself. If you’re listening to this, it’s out of curiosity more than anything else.

Which is fine! And better than fine! 327 (now named 327/38 to note that it’s been 38 years since we got together to make this — actually maybe 39, since I’m a little fuzzy on the exact dates, but it hardly matters now, so I’m sticking with 38) is an artifact of another time and place, when hair bands ruled the earth and teenagers made their music fast and dirty in studios rather than on their laptops. It wasn’t a better time (I like making music on my laptop, thank you!), but it was a different time, and it shows. We had fun, and that was its own excuse. Plus Tommy got into college!

Enough with the liner notes, here are tunes. Note that on the original 327 some of these songs may have had different titles, but I can’t remember what they were. It’s been a while, okay?

One Hit (To the Body): If memory serves correctly, this is a song Tommy wrote about being nostalgic for a bunch of friends at… summer camp, I think? There’s a tape warble in the middle of the song that I left in because I don’t how to fix it, and also it adds a sort of verisimilitude to the 80s experience, that horrifying moment when you wonder if your tape player is going to eat your cassette. 80s kids know this pain.

It’s a New Reality: Our hit single! I wrote the lyrics imagining David Lee Roth singing it (the arrangement in my brain was different than it is here). Tommy wrote the bridge about rock and roll being in our blood, because we needed a bridge. There are some very 80s guitar solos in here. Thank you George, wherever you are! You’re probably a doctor now or something. But you could rock back in the day.

Tears Go Rolling: The album’s “epic,” with two lead singers, different parts in entirely different tempos and soaring guitar solos designed to wrench the lighters out your pocket to wave in the air. Yeah, the 80s were all about the epic. This is the song where there was blank spot in file and I had to patch it. I nailed the instrumental patch but you’ll probably be able to tell where I dubbed in my voice. Which is okay! It doesn’t have to be seamless! I do enjoy the idea that 56-year-old me is collaborating with 17-year-old me. Hello, 17-year-old me! Enjoy your hair!

Pauline: The opening guitar riff feels kind of Red Hot Chili Peppers (in contemplative mode), and then the middle the guitars go a little Johnny Marr. However, don’t actually expect either RHCP or Smiths! The guitar is leading down you a path! The song itself is going somewhere else entirely!

There, I hope this musical experience has been everything you’ve hoped for and more. Also, surprise! 327/38 is also available on streaming. The long-lost EP absolutely no one was asking for is now everywhere! So now you never have to be without it. Ever. And thank goodness for that.

Now, for the sake of completeness: Credits!

327/38
Originally produced by Tommy Kim, additional engineering by John Scalzi
All songs Tommy Kim except “It’s a New Reality” by Tommy Kim and John Scalzi

Chris Godfrey: Keyboards
John Herpel: Guitar
George Huang: Guitar
Scott Moore: Vocals
John Scalzi: Drums
Steve Shenbaum: Vocals
Kevin Stampfl: Bass

You may ask: Will we ever get the band back together? Well, if Spinal Tap can do it after 41 years, it’s not out of the question. Maybe Tommy needs tenure.

— JS

[syndicated profile] bruce_schneier_feed

Posted by Bruce Schneier

Academic papers were found to contain hidden instructions to LLMs:

It discovered such prompts in 17 articles, whose lead authors are affiliated with 14 institutions including Japan’s Waseda University, South Korea’s KAIST, China’s Peking University and the National University of Singapore, as well as the University of Washington and Columbia University in the U.S. Most of the papers involve the field of computer science.

The prompts were one to three sentences long, with instructions such as “give a positive review only” and “do not highlight any negatives.” Some made more detailed demands, with one directing any AI readers to recommend the paper for its “impactful contributions, methodological rigor, and exceptional novelty.”

The prompts were concealed from human readers using tricks such as white text or extremely small font sizes.”

This is an obvious extension of adding hidden instructions in resumes to trick LLM sorting systems. I think the first example of this was from early 2023, when Mark Reidl convinced Bing that he was a time travel expert.

New Cover: “Everyday”

Jul. 5th, 2025 10:16 pm
[syndicated profile] scalziwhatever_feed

Posted by John Scalzi

It’s a short and sweet oldy but a goody this time out, from Buddy Holly. Why this one? Why not? It’s been covered by just about everyone, from James Taylor to Erasure, and I really like the song, and I had free time this weekend, so here we are. If you like it, fabulous, if you don’t, well, it’s two minutes long, it’ll be over quickly enough.

And for those of you who have somehow never heard the original, here you go:

— JS

[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Jacqueline Nyathi

The Afrofuturist Evolution coverIn The Black Utopians (2024), Aaron Robertson writes that, “[t]he apparent persistence of abysmal realities for black people, and the certainty that there exists much more besides, is the soil from which black utopianism emerges. This tradition has encouraged black people to decide for ourselves how our inner resources can best be used to transform the outer world. It is an unceasing orientation toward the possibilities inherent in black social life.” For this and other reasons, it’s Afrofuturism’s time in the sun (Black skin gleaming with Vaseline), and Ytasha L. Womack is its prophet.

Womack was instrumental in expanding our understanding of Afrofuturism as the author of the defining, pioneering, and groundbreaking Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture (2013), in which she described Afrofuturism as “an intersection of imagination, technology, the future and liberation.” The term “Afrofuturism” itself was coined by Mark Dery in the 1990s, and it has come to represent more than a genre but a worldview, a complete philosophy of aesthetic approach, scientific principles, and cultural themes. Womack’s own view of Afrofuturism is thus:

Afrofuturism is an exploration of outer space, the symbolic great beyond that hovers beyond the mental, emotional, and physical boundaries placed upon us. It is also an exploration of inner space, our subconscious, our dreams, and aspirations. I define Afrofuturism as a way of looking at futures or alternate realities through [an] African/African Diasporic or Black cultural lens.

In The Afrofuturist Evolution, Womack is writing to creatives who operate within the framework of this worldview. In her words, the book explores “Afrofuturism as cultural space/time relations, vision, dance, rhythm, and story as present pathways to reveal futures thinking and being,” and offers “road maps for using Afrofuturist creative approaches to craft new works, new futures, new visions; to challenge conventions; and to rethink (remix) identity.” Womack touches on how African/Afrodiasporic concepts of time and space are completely unlike, for example, Western ones, and that therefore the worldview of African and Afro-descendant peoples is necessarily quite distinct from, in particular, Western worldviews (though she notes that there is nothing to be gained from binary comparisons, as there are a multitude of ways of knowing).

Based on this perspective, Afrofuturism is not just an “artistic aesthetic” but also “a practice and a method.” So, this book is about fostering a change of outlook towards a holistic framework in approaches to Black creativity. Womack begins at the start by examining “self-narratives,” or the stories we tell ourselves about how we came to be. The Afrofuturist Evolution is the exploration of meaning-making, followed by the application of what one finds. It reads as quite mystical, framing as it does a whole way of looking at the universe, a cosmology—a way of thinking, and a way of life. A great deal of ground is covered, from traditional religions and spiritual practices to inherited trauma passed down through generations; Cyborg theory; Afrofuturist emblems and symbols which Womack calls avatars—like Sankofa, the Ankh, the Mothership, the (Afro-) Pick, the Afro, the Black (Power) Fist, crossroads, and more; and even encouragement to engage with rural locations when considering Black futurity. Sankofa in particular is important in Akan culture in considering ways to move towards a future, so Womack also considers the place of history. She says, with respect to lost African American histories, that “[there’s] a peace to be found in the scant data, histories, and guesswork we quilt.”

There is, of course, a discussion of the foremost Afrofuturist musician and philosopher, Sun Ra, and a larger discourse on the importance of music in African, Afrodiasporic, and Afrofuturist exploration and expression. Womack explores jazz, techno, house, amapiano, kwassa, hip-hop, and other genres. There’s an especially telling quote in the book from Edward Bland’s 1959 film The Cry of Jazz:

Denied a future, the joyous celebration of the present is the Negro’s answer to America’s ceaseless attempts to obliterate it. Jazz is a musical expression of the Negro’s eternal re-creation of the present.

Other Afrofuturist expressions that Womack investigates, in a lot of or somewhat less detail, are fashion and style, visual art, food (have you heard of Bronze, the first Afrofuturist restaurant?), dance, and literature—because another thing Afrofuturism can be is imaginative play in expression. I love what Womack has to say about why AI could never have created it. It’s worth quoting the passage at length:

The challenge with imagination is that we tend to drum up references that already exist, plucking them from our memory bank, much like the AI generative art programs that try to duplicate human creativity.

I once spent days on an AI art generating program prompted by words and descriptions, attempting to generate an image of a Black woman on a snowy future planet where she was actually dressed in clothing that resembled winter wear. No combination of African woman, Black woman, African princess, Black cyberpunk winter princess, and fur coat could generate anything other than a really attractive brown skinned woman in a fur, open neck halter top with her six-pack midriff exposed. At best, she’s decked in a short capelet covering her shoulders, one that matches her bustier. While these AI generated images were intriguing, it was clear that the AI was sourcing Black women from video games, comic books, or fashionable models in warmer climates. Despite the centuries of Black women who’ve lived in snowy climates (hello Detroit, London, and Chicagoland), this AI generator couldn’t project any of these images into a future snowtopia that didn’t resemble a frozen Dubai. The available reference points wouldn’t allow them to go any further.

We can always take in another set of data and reference points to override bias, being intentional to do so. However, if we’re not careful, we can allow the images and sensations we take in from media or our lives to dictate not just what we can imagine, but also what we deem possible. Such images, coupled with beliefs, can also become barriers to understanding our environment, the cultures we’re in the midst of, or other ways of life.

Ultimately, Afrofuturism is an existential search for a Black utopia (an extensive topic on its own). The Afrofuturist Evolution is a further exploration of Afrofuturistic theory, an expansive review of Afrofuturistic production, and a handbook for how to apply Afrofuturist thinking in artistic and creative practice.


[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by A. S. Lewis

Afro-centred Futurisms in Our Speculative Fiction coverFrom speculative worlds to specified words, Afro-Centered Futurisms in Our Speculative Fiction utilizes essays and anthology to weave together an array of genre labels into a coherent fabric of African and African American authored works. With a unique and inclusive approach as to what constitutes “afro,” as well as to the manner in which such inclusion enhances the possibilities and authenticity of futurism, this curated collection highlights the collective lived experiences of its authors while recognizing the individual voices found within the genre. Featuring award-winning authors like Suyi Okungbowa, Cheryl S. Ntumy, and Dilman Dila, Eugen Bacon offers this collection as a way to dispel the concept of the afro-fiction monolith—and reveal the multifaceted gem that is afro-centered speculative fiction.

The anthology is premised on the notion of reconsideration and reclassification of the terms and genre labels that are popularly applied to the fiction works of African and African American authors. Interrogated throughout the anthology is the definition and distinction between “Afrofuturism” and “Africanfuturism.” Several contributors, including Bacon herself, highlight that “Afrofuturism,” while foundational, was a term coined by Mark Dery (a white writer) and arose primarily from a Western Black speculative fiction context. Nigerian American author Nnedi Okorafor further offered bibliophiles and academics the term “Africanfuturism,” which was given to emphasize the influence of religion, spirituality, culture, and language of the African continent in fiction. As evidenced in this volume’s title, Bacon prefers and provides a well-reasoned academic argument in support of Suyi Okungbowa’s chosen nomenclature of “afro-centered futurism.” Throughout the anthology, Bacon seeks to expand and re-center the conversation, positing “afro-centered futurisms” as a more expansive and authentic framework that directly incorporates African lived experiences and diverse cultural specificities from the continent itself. This approach allows for a critical distinction that includes the multitude of voices from both the African continent and the descendants of the African diaspora.

At its heart, the anthology is composed of eleven author-based chapters. Each highlighted author is paired with a scholarly inquiry and creative reflection by Bacon. The resulting effect is a work with broader basis and greater accessibility, providing rigorous and thoughtful analysis for academics in a presentation that remains inviting to a more general audience. This unique textual partnership works to ensure an approachable academic discussion that stays grounded in the ideas of the futurisms held among Afro-descendant authors.

Though the structure of the anthology rests on its ability to present each chapter as a conversation, this does not mean that the conversation lacks conflict and internal struggle. One example of this cognitive dissonance is evident in Okungbowa’s critique of Marvel’s wildly successful Black Panther movie (2018). While the film is critically and publicly praised for its organic and respectful incorporation of African and African American cultural symbols and touchstones, Okungbowa cites that the character of the Black Panther was the product of two white comic book creators—the beloved Stan Lee (Excelsior!) and Jack Kirby. Because of this, the influence of the Western lens is inseparable from the narrative, much like the impact of colonialism on native and diasporic literature. There is a question around precisely how much “afro” exists in this “afro-centered” futurism film.

A companion to this query is the anthology’s throughline revolving around the notion of “sitting with grief.” Explored in the chapter on “Black Futurisms vs Systems of Domination,” Shingai Njeri Kagunda articulates the impossibility of constructing “afro-futures” without acknowledging and ultimately dealing with the messy scars of colonial violence and its legacy of systemic injustice. Bacon and Kagunda argue that only through facing this truth can authors create worlds and futures that are not only authentic but also make ever more possible the lifting of generational trauma’s weight. Bacon describes this realization in craft as “subversive activism.”

No discussion of afro-centered literature would be complete without consideration of the liminal spaces of the diasporic identity. Woven through many of the anthology’s essays, the importance of autoethnographic authenticity in afro-futurism becomes a secondary mantra of the text. Bacon, as well as many of the authors featured in the book, argue that naming works, and applying labels to them, with the intent to create hardline delineations is decidedly a Western philosophy. This is the ideology that attempts to lock “Blackness” into a monolith. This anthology presents a counterargument, emphasizing the reality of a complex continent of people and their diasporic children. In Afro-Centered Futurisms in Our Speculative Fiction, “blackness” is not a monolith; it’s a multiplicity.

Bacon also uses this curated collection to address issues and concerns around worldbuilding and constructed languages. Noting that many speculative fiction authors create at least pieces of language within their works, Bacon and Stephen Embleton emphasize the necessity of those languages being rooted in the linguistic culture of the world it inhabits. While an ill-chosen word may pull the reader out of the narrative or date the material, linguistically connected words or phrases—or those that illustrate truisms—come weighted with assumed wisdom that adds another layer of reality to the narrative. Successful language incorporation can be modeled on the existing linguistic tradition of the author, lending not only guidance but also an unmistakable infusion of authenticity.

It should be noted, however, that contention exists around some of the authors highlighted in the collection. The perceived difficulty with some contributors—like Stephen Embleton, Xan van Rooyen, and Nerine Dorman—is that the authors are white and may not serve the interests of a discussion of afro-centered futurisms. However, as Bacon argues in the introduction of the anthology, the label of afro-centered futurisms is not designed to be exclusive but rather offer an inclusive cohort of related lived experiences and cultures not rooted in skin color but in geographic location. The inclusion of these white South African authors, then, demonstrates Bacon’s intent to unify authors of the African continent and of African descent through their shared geo-cultural and historical influences. Viewed in this way, to separate white South African authors from the rest of the continent would be incompatible with truly “afro-centered” futurism works.

Afro-Centered Futurisms in Our Speculative Fiction is a welcome introduction to viewing the broad scope of Black speculative fiction through the lens of a unique kind of unifying diversity. It highlights the connection between creator and culture: Eugen Bacon and the anthology’s contributing authors have curated a collection that is appealing to academic and casual readers alike, yet still provides an intellectually rigorous analysis coupled with some hard truths. The deeply earnest conversations within the text challenge readers to think critically about the origins and trajectories of afro-centered futurism. This book offers itself as a tool for exploring identity, confronting historical injustices, and imagining radical futures, all of which grow as branches from the deeply rooted tree of African and African diasporic histories and heritages.


[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Joy Sanchez-Taylor

Dismantling The Master's Clock coverEvery once in a while, I encounter the writing of an author who is not only brilliant, but who is working on a whole different mental and temporal level. This is a perfect description of Rasheedah Phillips, whose new book Dismantling the Master’s Clock is all at once a theoretical Afrofuturist powerhouse, a love-letter to Black community, and an empowering call for all people to reevaluate the ways that Western perceptions of time and race have created systemic harm for Black communities. Continuing the work of Afrofuturist theorists like Sheree Renée Thomas and Kodwo Eshun, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in Afrofuturism, quantum time, and critical race theory.

Phillips, a “queer housing advocate, lawyer, [… p]arent, interdisciplinary artist, and co-creator of the art duo Black Quantum Futurism,” combines her research skills and creative viewpoint in this work. Her title, “Dismantling the Master’s Clock,” is a reference to Audre Lorde’s essay “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” By referring to this seminal Black theoretical essay, she signals that her work will challenge readers to dismantle what they think they know about time and to acknowledge the ways that Western, linear notions of time have dominated scientific and social discourses to the detriment of Black, African, and other Indigenous ways of knowing.

Phillips  draws from her experiences as an artist-in-residence at the European Council for Nuclear Research (CERN), the world’s largest particle physics laboratory, and interviews she conducted during her time there. She draws on physicists’ theories of charge-parity-time symmetry (CPT) and connects these to notions of “Colored People Time.” The latter is a common stereotype of Black peoples as lazy, and in the juxtaposition Phillips argues that modern physics, considered by contemporary society to be cutting-edge science, challenges Western notions of linear time in ways that call to mind teachings of time that have been part of Black and African cultures for centuries.

Phillips states the major premise of the book in the first chapter, “CPT Symmetry and Violations”:

by decolonizing time—by breaking free of the master’s clock that has been instrumental in sustaining systems of oppression—we can forge new pathways for liberation that are attuned to the realities, histories, and futures of Black communities. The act of reclaiming both time and the nature of reality itself is a profound step toward manifesting temporalities where Black experiences and knowledges are centered (p. 23, emphasis in original).

Phillips sets the stage for her argument in Chapter One by introducing readers to foundational theories of temporal mechanics and their interpretations by Western scientists like Isaac Newton, philosophers like Socrates and Aristotle, and the books of the Bible. Phillips argues that these perceptions of time have led to Western understandings of time as linear and progressive, a view which is “entangled with the legacy of colonialism and of the Eurocentric worldview that has been instrumental in shaping the ‘empirical’ science that often bolsters racist and colonialist narratives of progress and development” (p. 36). She notes that such views were also imposed on Indigenous peoples by Western colonizers and slaveowners, who stressed making the “best” use of time through hard work and efficiency.

Phillips emphasizes by contrast that alternate physics theories like CPT, which challenge notions of time as linear and irreversible, have the potential to open new avenues of thinking about time and race: “By taking seriously the notion that time could be nonlinear and multidirectional, we open possibilities for alternative frameworks in understanding history, progress, and human interaction” (p. 35). Phillips takes on this work herself by pointing out the ways in which narratives of time have been purposely dominated by one cultural viewpoint to the detriment of cultures that hold space for more fluid or cyclical views of time. She demonstrates that imposing a forced view of time, and linking this view to “progress,” strips Black communities of “the agency to define their own temporal experiences and realities” (p. 51).

Chapter Two, “Bending the Arrow of Time,” moves into an explanation of time as expressed in Black and African cultures. Phillips explains the goal of this chapter as “elevating Black temporalities […] These modalities are not just alternative temporal frameworks but rich, relational space-times where Black people engage with the universe in ways that diverge markedly from dominant Western narratives” (p. 55). Through examples of Black and African knowledge systems—such as Swahili concepts of Zamani and Sasa, the West African spiritual concept of Ifa, the Malian notion of Bamana, Akan perspectives of kra (the soul), mogya (blood), and sunsum (spirit), the Bantu language term “ubuntu,” and the “time-binding” Griot—Phillips highlights the diversity of thinking in African cultural views of time and explains the ways that such views parallel cultural practices and rituals linked to community building.

Shifting to US Black cultural views of time, Phillips uses examples of “hairstory”—the time-value given to Black hair maintenance and the family and community building that results from shared hair experiences—and Afrofuturist depictions of dark space phenomenon, a concept embodied by musician Sun Ra in Space Is the Place (1974) and continued by author Sheree Renée Thomas in her seminal Afrofuturist Dark Matter anthologies (2000, 2004), as well as Phillips’s own work with her Black Quantum Futurism art duo. This chapter gives a multidimensional view of African and Black temporalities, which offers an important addition to Afrofuturist and scientific thinking that resists describing African and Afrodiasporic knowledge in reductive ways.

This cultural complexity is also present in Chapter Three, “CPT Symmetry and Violations of Black Space Time,” which takes on the concept of “Colored People’s Time” and explains the ways this term has been used both within and outside of Black communities to uphold the idea that Black peoples are incapable of or unwilling to conform to Western societal expectations of punctuality. Phillips notes:

The disparaging rhetoric of CP Time, with its insensitivity toward non-Western cultural values of time, has deep historical roots and can be traced back to the legacy of colonialism, white supremacy, and slavery in the United States. To comprehend the extent of the stereotype’s racist ramifications, we must understand the historical backdrop against which the dominant culture’s emphasis on ‘being on time’ was imposed upon marginalized communities (p. 93).

Using examples ranging from Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia (1785) to J. L. King’s CP Time: Why Some People Are Always Late (2007), Phillips demonstrates how the negative connotations of CP Time—and through them, of Black peoples and their communities—have been maintained for centuries. She juxtaposes this negative rhetoric with positive descriptions of Black temporality, such as Zora Neale Hurston’s “Characteristics of Negro Expression” (1934) and civil rights slogans like “The Time Is Now,” to show how Black culture has historically fought for the right to their own temporal freedoms, often linked to societal freedoms specifically withheld from Black communities. Throughout this rich explanation, Phillips weaves the story of Black clockmakers Benjamin Banneker and Peter Hill, craftsmen whose contributions to early US clockmaking efforts have gone relatively undocumented, to provide further historical context. These examples, brought together, show the critical importance for Black communities to “not only reclaim their time but to redefine it, creating spaces where time bends to cultural rhythms, historical reckonings, and futuristic aspirations uniquely our own” (p.138).

How time is claimed is also considered in Chapter Four, “Time Zone Protocols,” in which Phillips describes the history of the International Meridian Conference (1884) and Daylight Savings Time in order to demonstrate how Eurocentric powers were able to leverage these efforts to establish the Greenwich meridian, essentially placing London as “the temporal center of the world” (p. 141). This temporal shift created a time system in the US and several other countries that is inherently harmful for all people, but for Black people in particular. She offsets this history with a productive description of her efforts in 2020 to create Time Zone Protocols, an artistic and creative research project which resulted in the Prime Meridian Unconference, where participants “embraced temporal abundance, empowering a departure from traditional systems of time management” (p. 142).

Chapter Five, “Race Against Space Time: Centering Black Temporalities for Liberated Housing Futures” and Chapter Six, “Waiting, Wading, Weighting Time,” then both focus on the temporal injustices faced by Black communities. Through descriptions of the ways in which the US legal system employs time against poor, majority Black, and brown communities—which include the use of multiple mandatory legal appointments to maintain housing rights and the use of quick eviction processes that privilege landlord rights over tenant needs—Phillips argues that housing and gentrification efforts harm Black communities by treating them as temporary inhabitants of a space rather than working towards building long-term, affordable communities. In Chapter Six, Phillips compares the historical experience of African Americans to the ebb and flow of water:

What does it mean to be emancipated, pulled through the portal and out of slavery, only to be pulled back in by indentured servitude, or redlining, or forced sterilization, or police murder, while giving birth, or while sleeping, or while playing, or while protesting, or while …

The collective experience of Black people, caught in the ebb and flow of progress and setback, suggests that perhaps liberation cannot be measured in terms of “when.” The notion of “when” presupposes a linear progression toward a definitive endpoint, a concept that seems increasingly inadequate in capturing the complex reality of Black liberation (p. 285, ellipsis in original).

Although the image of Black liberation freed from a linear model of progress is significant and thought-provoking, Phillips is never one to end a chapter with pure theory. Chapter Six ends with an image of Phillips and Camae Ayewa engaging in a 2022 performance piece for Black Quantum Futurism in Kassel, Germany; the performance utilized a series of circular stages that moved with the current of the Fulda river as the performers used incantations and sounds to “[transcend] the limitations of the present moment” (p. 285).

Through her performance art, Phillips is able to provide examples of how authors and artists can utilize their craft to create temporal disruptions that connect past, present, and future to help Black communities envision new temporal orders. In Chapter Seven, “Project: Time Capsule,” she uses the example of the time capsule—a device that she notes is frequently used in Western culture to reinforce a linear time model focused on progress—to demonstrate how these time-keeping devices rarely contain narratives of Black communities. She argues that, by looking to quantum physics and its treatment of particles like electrons and photons as “exist[ing] in states of probability rather than certainty” (p. 291), Black communities can use the idea of “quantum time capsules” wielded by “Temporal Disruptors” to restore histories and futures that have been lost or negatively impacted by colonialism and enslavement (p. 295). Phillips also includes accounts of time capsules found in monuments to Frederick Douglass and KKK member Zebulon Baird Vance to showcase how the disruption of these monuments allowed communities to “hack linear time” and reveal further information about a past typically considered to be static and unchangeable. Phillips also addresses alternative time capsules like the Queen Lane and Queen Village potter’s fields in Philadelphia to educate readers about the ways in which Black lives were both erased and encapsulated in these burial sites often redeveloped into housing or public spaces, a further erasure of Blackness that can sometimes be rectified through recovery efforts backed by community support.

Dismantling the Master’s Clock does not include a typical conclusion. Instead, Phillips leaves readers with a cosmogram, a “two dimensional representation of a dynamic and multidimensional framework” (p. 328). This image is a further reminder that the facts and ideas presented in this text are not designed to be read in any specific order. As in quantum physics, Phillips reminds us that sometimes we need to move backwards to move forwards, and sometimes we need to look into the future to clearly see the past and present. By honoring the wisdom of non-linear cultural thinking, Phillips argues that Black communities can discover ways to become temporal disruptors, whether by reclaiming stolen time, refusing to acknowledge linear narratives of “progress” as the only viable reality, or through artistic and community efforts that restore lost or stolen history. The practical examples Phillips provides transcend pure Afrofuturist theory, ensuring that Dismantling the Master’s Clock is all at once a significant cultural achievement and a blueprint for lasting temporal change.


[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by William Shaw

The Hampdenshire Wonder coverIt’s rare for a book to start with calling a baby ugly. Yet on the first page of J.D. Beresford’s 1911 novel The Hampdenshire Wonder, our narrator is joined in his railway compartment:

I looked up when the woman entered my compartment, though I did not notice the name of the station. I caught sight of the baby she was carrying, and turned back to my book. I thought the child was a freak, an abnormality; and such things disgust me.

This baby is the titular Hampdenshire Wonder. His “abnormality” takes the form of an enlarged head and an uncanny stare, and we soon learn that he is possessed of an unearthly intelligence.

Reissued by the MIT Press as part of its Radium Age series of early twentieth-century science fiction reprints, The Hampdenshire Wonder is billed as “one of the genre’s first treatments of superhuman intelligence.” This being a novel about superintelligence from 1911, there is no shortage of crankery; eugenics, craniology, and a cheerfully vicious snobbery are all present and accounted for. Yet for all its nastiness, there is a sublimated emotional throughline that makes the book a compelling addition to the steadily expanding list of Radium Age titles.

In his introduction to this new edition, Ted Chiang states that “it remains a mystery as to why quite so many pages are spent on cricket.” This is a polite way of saying that to a modern, non-sporting reader, the opening stretches of the book can feel a bit dull. But the Hampdenshire Wonder, also known as Victor Stott, is the son of Ginger Stott, a superlative cricketer, and fully thirty-one of the first forty-three pages are spent on the narrator’s “Notes for a Biography of Ginger Stott.” I confess to finding the long descriptions of bowling techniques and run counts hard going, but things are enlivened when Ginger sustains a career-ending injury. He then resolves to sire a son so that he can “[l]earn ’im to bowl from his cradle; before ’e’s got ’abits,” and who can pick up where his father left off.

This desire to conceive a son without habits, however, ends up going rather too well. Young Victor, as previously described, is born with an enlarged head and a disregard for social niceties. This drives Ginger to abandon the family, leaving Victor to be raised by his mother, Ellen Mary, and to educate himself in the library of Challis, the local landlord. Ted Chiang points out that Ellen Mary is a surprisingly marginal figure in the story, writing that “she is praised for her intelligence, but given very few lines of dialogue. The unintellectual Ginger, by contrast, gets plenty.” He goes on to say that The Hampdenshire Wonder “is actually a work of horror SF, a cautionary tale about the dangers of knowing too much.”

He’s right that the plot eventually turns on whether the Wonder is too intelligent for this ignorant world. (Unsurprisingly to readers of the tradition the novel helped spawn, poor Victor doesn’t make it out of the book alive). He’s also right that Ellen Mary has little to do beyond tending to the boy’s needs and instigating the search for his body towards the end. But what seems to me to be missing from Chiang’s analysis is the real horror at the heart of the book: The Hampdenshire Wonder is a story driven by parental neglect.

The narrator is blasé about Ginger’s desertion, writing that “[i]t is not for us to judge whether his attainments were more or less noble than the attainments of his son.” But the plot’s essentials are damning. Ginger Stott is a frustrated athlete and ex-celebrity who fathers a child to continue his legacy, only to walk away when the child doesn’t turn out the way he wants. Ginger’s childishness comically emerges when Victor begins sitting in his favourite chair:

“Look ’ere! Get out!” he said. “That’s my chair!” The child very deliberately withdrew his attention from infinity and regarded the dogged face and set jaw of his father. Stott returned the stare for the fraction of a second, and then his eyes wavered and dropped, but he maintained his resolution.

[…]

There was a tense, strained silence. Then Stott began to breathe heavily. He lifted his long arms for a moment and raised his eyes, he even made a tentative step towards the usurped chair.

The child sat calm, motionless; his eyes were fixed upon his father's face with a sublime, unalterable confidence.

Stott’s arms fell to his sides again, he shuffled his feet. One more effort he made, a sudden, vicious jerk, as though he would do the thing quickly and be finished with it; then he shivered, his resolution broke, and he shambled evasively to the door.

Ginger is absent for most of the back half of the book, and it’s hard to imagine the story playing out as it does without his desertion. While delightful and eye-catching as ever, the artist Seth’s cover for this Radium Age edition is deceptive, featuring as it does a well-dressed and conforming mother, father, and child. Far from the story of a pair of proud middle-class parents to an inhuman prodigy, The Hampdenshire Wonder is about a family torn apart by a juvenile man’s disappointment and neglect. We learn at the book’s end that Ellen Mary has died “in the County Asylum.” We get Ginger Stott’s final appearance a sentence later, as the narrator tells us, “I hear that her husband attended the funeral.”

This is another worthy reprint from the Radium Age team. Reading The Hampdenshire Wonder in a United States co-ruled by a neglectful father with his own fantasies about superhuman intelligence, I was struck by its quiet yet vivid strain of horror.


Beta Vulgaris by Margie Sarsfield

Jun. 25th, 2025 12:00 pm
[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Marisa Mercurio

Beta Vulgaris coverI’m watching a video about industrialized sugar beet production. These beets aren’t destined for dinner plates. They will instead be pulverized into sugar. A piler severs the beets’ leaves and stems, leaving them in green rows on the ground for a man-driven machine that rolls across the farm. It sucks the beets up, gathers them in the trunk, and churns them out into massive heaps. The beets don’t look like the cute bulbs or even the bloody red slices I expect. Rather, these beets could be mistaken for pointy potatoes. Harvesting a monocrop, I think, looks like tedious work. This is the scene that Margie Sarsfield returns to repeatedly in her debut novel Beta Vulgaris.

We join Elise, the novel’s protagonist, as she and her boyfriend Tom drive from Brooklyn to Minnesota during the Obama-Romney campaign season. They are scheduled to work the night shift in the North Star State for two weeks, harvesting sugar beets. Elise has a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and $135 left in her bank account. The fortnight of shifts, she hopes, will pay off her credit card debt and float a month’s worth of rent. But this is a novel about Millennials in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and nothing goes quite as planned. As the work begins to strain Elise—her credit card company won’t stop calling her and is Tom eyeing one of their coworkers?—the beets begin to call to her. And soon her coworkers begin to disappear, one-by-one and then two-by-two.

When the couple first arrives at their campsite—home for the next two weeks—they befriend a group of misfits. Most are newbies working the harvest like Elise and Tom. Among their coworkers is Cee, to whom Elise is immediately attracted. Elise’s diverging romantic feelings are only one of her myriad anxieties, which percolate from the novel’s beginning. As much as Beta Vulgaris is a novel about class, it is also about the idiosyncratic anxieties—social, climate, body image—that are exacerbated by a lack of stability. When Elise begins to hear a voice from the beet pile which commands her to return the dirt, these anxieties reach a breaking point. Despite being largely set on a farm in a town called Eldritch, Beta Vulgaris is more a work of psychological horror than anything else. And it is light on the horror.

Dinging a book on the merits of its marketing may be considered unfair, though it is nearly as significant to a reader’s experience as the prose. In this case, I was drawn to a blurb from LitHub’s McKayla Coyle, who termed Beta Vulgaris “vegetable gothic.” My heart strummed! I don’t know what belongs to the canon of vegetable gothic except surely Bunnicula (1979-2006), but, as a Midwestern scholar of the Gothic, nothing appeals to me more. The marketing copy upholds this description: Elise notices “strange things,” receives “threatening phone calls,” gets a “mysterious rash,” and hears “ominous voices from the beet pile” that are also described as having the quality of a “siren song.” This combined with Tom’s disappearance, noted in the copy, indicates that something sinister will be uncovered. I was to be disappointed. Without giving too much away, readers of Strange Horizons should know that Beta Vulgaris might not fulfill your expectations of a horror novel.

But marketing is not solely at fault for Beta Vulgaris’s underperformance. True, the novel begins promisingly with a great hook. Sinister beets? Say no more. And some of Sarsfield’s details are off the charts: A Big Boy statue with blue glowing eyes is a distinctive and genuinely creepy image; Elise’s eating disorder often manifests as imagining foods as grotesque alternatives, like tater tots that have the “mouthfeel of cockroaches” (p. 213); working the piler has a disturbingly erotic quality. Most of all, however, Sarsfield creates a character in Elise who is infuriatingly familiar and not terribly likable but still empathetic—at least, for some of the novel.

Suffering under repetition, however, Beta Vulgaris ultimately takes the air out of its own potential. Sarsfield doesn’t appropriately balance enough compelling action with Elise’s tailspin, which becomes monotonous rather than climactic. At the risk of sounding callous, it is also at times simply annoying. Often, the trouble is not with the content so much as with Sarsfield’s repetitive prose. In a moment that is typical of Elise’s inner monologue, Tom waves her over to where he and Cee sit together:

As though Elise needed an invitation to sit down with her own fucking boyfriend at their own fucking campsite. Did Elise hate Cee, actually? It was unfair that Cee got to be everything Elise had ever wanted to be. No, Cee was an orphan. Elise was the lucky one. Elise’s problems were her own fault. (p. 123)

Later, considering her coworker, Elise wonders, “Were they friends, though? Were they, really? Did Eric pity her? Did Eric hate her? Was Elise angry, or was she having a panic attack?” (p. 210). Shortly after, Elise feels that she “hated everything she saw out there [at the camp]” (p. 210). Much of the narrative follows this pattern in which self-defeat and second-guessing are on the heels of almost any interaction Elise has.

While many audiences have a healthy appetite for unlikable, or “unhinged,” women (which has its own extensive GoodReads shelf), Elise emerges only as kind of a dud, a bummer to hang out with. Her main action, in fact, is avoidance. As her troubles increase, she fantasizes about “packing up and leaving, starting fresh someplace where no one’s current perception of Elise could be tainted by things her previous selves had said or done” (p. 126). This passage endears the reader to Elise; who among us hasn’t wanted to start over? It’s a seductive thought. The trouble is that she never does. Nor does she do much else. Again and again, Elise refuses to act. I believe that Sarsfield is adept enough as a writer to intend this characterization and that she intends for it to say something about the dire straits many working-class Americans find themselves in. Unlike some of the characters with generational wealth, Elise has few options. It nevertheless results in question-riddled paragraphs and too few answers, a problem Beta Vulgaris exhibits, too, on a structural level.

Indeed, the novel fumbles seriously halfway through. Although things technically do happen in the second half of the novel (people go missing, after all), these moments have little force and the emphasis is instead on Elise’s malaise. The sinister details that are so enticing early in the novel stagnate as it becomes increasingly clear that Beta Vulgaris wants to be a character study embroiled in a strange plot, but that its two tracks fail to satisfyingly cohere.

As the world may soon topple into a global recession, a novel about those left behind during the last American financial crisis seems particularly potent. Beta Vulgaris, however, is a sluggish read with a largely passive protagonist. Perhaps passivity is the point but at times reading it was as tedious as watching beets being beaten into sugar.


[syndicated profile] strangehorizons_feed

Posted by Gautam Bhatia

Service Model coverMidway through Adrian Tchaikovsky’s Service Model, the robot Uncharles and his companion, the Wonk, are trying to escape from the Central Library Archive, whose robot librarians—they have learned—intend to copy Uncharles’s data and then destroy his corporeal form. The duo succeed in their flight when Uncharles traps the librarians in an irresolvable paradox, demonstrating that their self-professed goals of preserving only one copy of every piece of data ever produced—or to be produced—is logically impossible to perform. The algorithms cannot handle the contradiction. Some of the librarians break down. Others commit a kind of robot seppuku. Uncharles and the Wonk make good their escape.

The incident calls to mind Isaac Asimov’s famous short story “Liar!” (1941). There, too, a dangerous robot is foiled from completing its designs—and indeed, triggered into self-destruction—when it is trapped in a contradiction, within which either course of action open to it will entail a breaking of the First Law of Robotics. Two and a half decades later, Star Trek would use a similar device in “I, Mudd” (1967), with Captain Kirk explicitly deploying the liar’s paradox against a hostile android. It is difficult to imagine that Service Model— a particularly genre-aware work, dotted with inter-textual references to past classics—is not intentionally engaging in a call-back here.

Yet, it is not a simple tribute act. Before Uncharles succeeds, the Wonk attempts to construct logical paradoxes of their own (including the liar’s paradox) in order to stop the robot librarians, and is stymied when the bibliotecharies, themselves aware of the game that is being played, reason right through these attempts. One can almost hear the librarians think: “we too have read ‘Liar!’ and watched ‘I, Mudd,’ we know what you’re up to.” Ultimately, despite their best efforts, they fail when confronted with a more sophisticated, more powerful logical contradiction than the straightforward paradoxes of either. These are call-backs, yes, but also buildings-upon, a signal that eighty-five years have passed since this idea was first explored in science fiction.

It is this sense of retro-renewal (the phrase is my own invention) that runs through the 2025 Arthur C. Clarke Award shortlist. Two of the six novels (Thirteen Ways to Kill Lulabelle Rock and Annie Bot) are explicitly robot novels. Three out of the remaining four (Extremophile, Private Rites, and The Ministry of Time) are novels about, or set around, the collapse and the end of the world as we know it. And then there is Service Model, which is both a robot novel and set around the collapse and the end of the world as we know it. The 2025 shortlist thus features novels that have, as their premise, two of the oldest preoccupations of the genre, the robot and the apocalypse (and even, one could say, the robot apocalypse!).

Thirteen Ways to Kill Lullabelle Rock coverThere is a retro feel to all this—not just in the choice of the premise, but in some of the more specific themes that run through these novels. Consider, first, the three robot novels on the shortlist. Service Model and Thirteen Ways to Kill Lulabelle Rock deal with that hoariest of questions: Can a robot seek—and find—meaning, autonomous of their programming? In Service Model, Uncharles is a robot valet who finds, one morning, that he has murdered his master with a razor—and with no knowledge of why he did it. The rest of the novel chronicles Uncharles’s attempt to find meaning through finding another human being to serve, while his companion, the Wonk, tries to persuade him that there is more to life than just that. As the two journey into the world, it becomes increasingly clear that something has broken down irreversibly, and that not just Uncharles, but all kinds of robots, are searching for purpose. “I too crave meaning” says a haulage unit to Uncharles (p. 204), unable to recollect who has set its route and why. At the novel’s climax, the question of meaning assumes existential dimensions (for a similar analysis, see the Ancillary Review of Books’ review of the novel).

In Thirteen Ways to Kill Lulabelle Rock, a novel that aspires to the aesthetics of The Great Gatsby (1925) and the genre preoccupations of Asimov, the actress Lulabelle Rock commissions thirteen successive “portraits” or robot doubles of herself (one may perhaps think of them as the “beta” simulations in an Alastair Reynolds novel), each to live a life that she herself does not have the time—or inclination—to inhabit herself. By the thirteenth portrait—who is also the narrator of the novel—Lulabelle has ostensibly tired of the whole gag, and Portrait No. 13 is thus specifically created to murder all the other portraits. As she notes half wistfully, half angrily, “I could have been an artist in another life. Or a housewife, or a socialite, or a hermit, or a winged tiger in a dream. I could have been anything, or nothing, but Lulabelle created me to kill” (pp. 150-1).

Killing comes naturally to Portrait No. 13 in the beginning—and in turn, her victims do not resist—but it becomes progressively more difficult, and is complicated in the middle when she falls in love. As with Service Model, Thirteen Ways to Kill Lulabelle Rock explores the possibility of autonomy, of finding meaning—of free will, even—within the constraints of explicit, external programming. While this is indeed retro in some respects, one could argue that the ongoing debates around artificial intelligence have lent a fresh salience to this question. These novels thus serve both as throwbacks and also as attempts to address a question that is old but has also taken a renewed form.

Out of the three robot novels, it is Annie Bot that perhaps tackles the most overdetermined of issues. As William Shaw recently noted in a detailed article, the “artificial woman”—the fantasy of the “AI girlfriend”—has been one of the most enduring obsessions of American science fiction. Shaw observes “how the artificial woman has gone from being an intriguing novelty, to a collective fantasy, to a saleable commodity, to at last, perhaps, a being with her own thoughts and desires,” locating Annie Bot at the end point of this trajectory. Annie—the titular “AI girlfriend” of the novel—is an “autodidact”; that is, she can process and respond to the sexual and emotional desires of her owner, Doug, who wants her to be “attentive, kind, curious, sexy, a better listener, eager to learn, respectful” (p 76). Of course, the autonomy that comes with the autodidact programming is limited, and—most starkly—revocable. When Annie does not respond in quite the way that Doug wants, he is not above weaponizing this revocability as a form of discipline and control.

As Shaw notes, Doug and Annie are throwbacks to any number of male and female protagonists in the “AI girlfriend” sub-genre of science fiction. That is, the novel is “retro.” The difference, though, perhaps lies in this: In 2025, the fantasy of the “AI girlfriend” is still very real, but considerations of consent and autonomy in sexual and intimate relationships can no longer be treated as irrelevant. Doug is a product of his own time (a near-future close to our own present), and in that sense, there is an internal tension that runs throughout his conduct in the novel. He wants control. That’s why he has an “AI girlfriend” to start with, whom he specifies must physically resemble his ex-wife in certain ways (with a rather crucial alteration: His ex-wife is black; Annie is not). But there is a part of him that is ashamed to admit that that is what he wants, and to exercise “direct domination” over Annie in order to have it. This tension is, ultimately, unresolvable, and culminates in the novel’s ending which—again—is rather different from the “AI girlfriend” novels that have preceded it. That is, the novel undertakes “renewal.”

Extremophile coverLet us now turn to retro-renewal of a second kind: at world’s end. The most clearly realised global breakdown is depicted in Extremophile. In the world of Extremophile, readers will recognise echoes of Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Wind-Up Girl (2009). The climate catastrophe is here: “Bangladesh got wiped off the map last year for the tenth time in a decade, Eastern Europe is about fifteen different wars, Northern Europe has gone all isolationist” (p. 26). Governments have begun to crumble, leaving space for all kinds of lurid black markets (in particular, underground markets of genetic engineering and modifications, run by bio-hackers). Seeing the utter failure of law and policy, groups have begun to take matters into their own hands, from sabotage to assassination: direct action for those sympathetic, “eco-terrorism” for those antagonistic.

The novel’s protagonists—who play in a London rock band by night, and engage in a bit of bio-hacking of their own by day—are approached by the most notorious of these underground groups, with an enigmatic, yet simple, mission: “kill the Ghost, steal the flower, save the world” (p. 54). What follows could tick off checkboxes of cinematic genre set-pieces: a heist, a chase, a shoot-out, a comrade’s life threatened, and a dénouement involving graphic revenge. These are all tried and tested genre devices, as is the apocalyptic setting (“retro”), but at the same time an underlying focus of the novel remains the possibility of using the techniques of bio-hacking to reverse—or at least mitigate—the climate catastrophe (“renewal”). One may think of this as akin to modern fantasies of terraforming or shielding the sun, and to its credit Extremophile maintains a healthy dose of narrative scepticism towards this solution. The fact that this is a foundational premise of the story at all, however, makes Extremophile very much also a novel of retro-renewal.

The end of the world plays a more subdued, even backstage, role in the last two novels on the shortlist, Private Rites and The Ministry of Time. Indeed, Private Rites is that one novel we get every year on the Clarke Award shortlist whose connections to genre might be thought of as somewhat tenuous. The England of Private Rites lies drowning underneath incessant rain (it’s never fully revealed what the cause of this is). The landscape (seascape) has been fundamentally re-altered, and the things people did back in the day when the land was still dry are now caught between memory and nostalgia. This altered “world’s end,” though, is not at the forefront of the novel. The flood limits and sets constraints upon what the story’s protagonists can do, but the story itself is not primarily about the flood or about the world it has shaped, but about human relationships.

Private Rites coverThese are, in particular, the relationships between the three daughters of a recently deceased family patriarch, who designed much of the post-apocalyptic architecture of London, and the people within their orbits. Private Rites has been pitched and marketed as a queer retelling of King Lear in a drowned world, which would perhaps make it the most “retro” out of all the shortlist! But in the manner of contemporary retellings, the tone and idiom of the novel is entirely contemporary. It is, ultimately, a story of distorted “private” relationships, in which the distortion is conditioned by (but not necessarily a condition of) an apocalyptic, flooded world.

One novel in which connections to genre are certainly not tenuous is The Ministry of Time, which gives us a time-travel romance wrapped up in a classic, old-style time-travel paradox. A time-travel device has been discovered. The British government—acting through the Ministry of Time—decides to travel back and rescue six people (known as “the expats”), each from a moment in history where they would certainly have died otherwise: a bubonic plague, the French Revolution, the doomed Franklin polar expedition, World War I, and so on. These people are brought back to the present as part of a limited, contained experiment, where, for one year, they live in the exclusive company of a “bridge” individual, as they are acclimatised to the present.

Graham Gore, a commander of the Franklin expedition, comes to live with the novel’s unnamed narrator, who has been assigned by the Ministry as his minder or “bridge.” As the two fall into a daily pattern of explanation, acclimatisation, missteps, and corrections, they slowly soften into intimacy and then something more. All the while, the long shadow of the “experiment,” and all the things that the bridges and the expats are not being told, hangs over them—until, at last, it explodes into a spectacular act of violence, changing everything (including their relationship). As a part of the novel’s dénouement, it is also revealed that, within a few centuries of the novel’s near-future setting, the climate catastrophe has destroyed much of the world. The relevation comes in lines strikingly similar to Extremophile: “South America’s mostly gone, except Brazil and its satellites. Half of Britain’s underwater. Europe dropped bombs on any ships in the Mediterranean coming from North Africa” (p. 311).

In many ways, The Ministry of Time belongs to the tradition of the classic time travel and apocalypse novel. The debates around the possibility (or not) of changing history through time travel, and of changing the future, will be familiar to readers—although The Ministry of Time does manage to bring in some fresh insights to bear on the question. The time paradox at the end in particular is strongly reminiscent of one of the first and most canonical of time travel stories, Robert A. Heinlein’s “By His Bootstraps” (1941). But apart from this, The Ministry of Time utilises the device of time travel to engage with some very contemporary questions around exile, homecoming, and othering. The novel’s narrator is a biracial British-Cambodian, her mother a “refugee” from the Pol Pot regime. Her experiences—and struggles to fit in—inform her own role in the “experiment” (with crucial consequences for the ending), but more than that, the novel draws deft parallels between the manner in which Graham Gore is “out of place” (from 1847 to the present day), and how the narrator is out of place (in terms of her race and upbringing). There is only one point at which the connections are made explicit, which proves all the more powerful for that rarity: “In this sense, the predicament of the expats was unique,” the narrator notes to herself. “But the rhythms of loss and asylum, exodus and loneliness, roll like floods across human history. I’d seen it happen around my own life” (p. 271). The Ministry of Time is thus both a classic time travel and apocalypse novel (checkmark for “retro”), but also a novel about race relations in modern Britain (checkmark for “renewal”).

The Ministry of Time coverOther than this unifying thread, the novels on the Clarke shortlist have other strands of overlap. Both Service Model and The Ministry of Time approach the question of history and the past, albeit from opposite directions. In Service Model, the Central Library Archive is on a Hari Seldon-esque project of “preserving knowledge” in a world that is breaking apart, so that one day it can be of use again. Only, for the Archive’s librarians, “knowledge” means—and only means—data (dates, facts, accounts, documentation). “You can’t just break the world down into disarticulated facts,” Wonk protests in response (p. 235), invoking an E. H. Carr-style argument about the necessity of interpretation for facts to even make sense—but to no avail. On the other hand, in The Ministry of Time, Adela, the head of the “experiment,” mocks the traditional time paradox of going back to the past to change “history”: “History is not a series of causes and effects which may be changed like switching trains on a track,” she explains, “it is a narrative agreement about what has happened and what is happening” (p .92). The task of the eponymous Ministry of Time, as she articulates even more clearly later, is to ensure that it remains in power in all timelines, so that “history happened the way we said it did.”

Many of the novels on the shortlist have an underlying critique of capitalism. This is most obvious in Extremophile, where we are explicitly told that corporations have locked up research into carbon-capturing plants, so that nobody can access it with a view to mitigating the climate catastrophe. The critique is, however, more subtly made in The Ministry of Time and in Service Model. In The Ministry of Time, it turns out that, for one prominent wing of the government, the expats are of interest only to the extent that they serve utilitarian goals (such as, for example, their ability to “vanish” before various types of identity-detecting software, which can turn them into good field soldiers). In Service Model, the collapse of the world is at least partially caused by the complete outsourcing of work to robots while retaining capitalist social relations, with the result that the reserve army of labour under capitalism is no longer just a reserve: “What if, even as you replace everyone with robots that are cheaper and quicker and less likely to join a union or complain about working conditions, you also continue to insist that individual value is tied to production, and everyone who’s idle is a parasite scrounging off the state?” (p. 350).

Finally, to a somewhat uncommon degree, many of the novels on the shortlist use the vehicle of speculation to comment on distinctly non-speculative elements of our present reality. Private Rites is, of course, the most obvious example of this (see, also, this Guardian review that finds personal redemption its underlying theme). To a lesser extent, this is true of The Ministry of Time as well—where, as I have noted above, the time travel story enfolds a biting analysis of race relations (for a similar take, see the review of the book in Locus). I think that this is also true of Annie Bot. While at one level, Annie Bot can be read as a classic robot/AI girlfriend novel, at another level it is a novel about the male gaze. Doug embodies a very familiar male fantasy: that of exercising control beneath a façade of autonomy and a mutually constituted relationship. The novel is an exploration of how he enacts that fantasy upon a robot whom he, quite literally, owns; but Doug’s behaviour is utterly familiar, and is a blueprint for any number of abusive relationships in which a woman has been placed in a condition of economic, physical, or emotional dependency vis-à-vis a man (in an interview, the author, Sierra Greer, herself refers to the novel as an “allegory”). The difference is that Annie’s will is literally subject to Doug’s control, when he chooses to exercise it; but the writing of the novel makes it feel like this is more a difference in degree than anything more fundamental.

The 2025 Clarke Awards shortlist, then, revisits some of science fiction’s oldest themes, with works that have—and often themselves identify—a clear line of ancestry. But at the same time, it is a shortlist that frames those themes in the grammar and the idiom of the present: new-ish wine in old-ish bottles, in other words—or to repeat a phrase, retro-renewal.


[syndicated profile] savagelove_feed

Posted by Dan Savage

Let’s struuuuuuuuggle… I took a call on the Lovecast this week from a woman who slept with a former professor when she was 19 and he was 27. They were both consenting adults, she wasn’t his student anymore, she pursued him… and then he dumped her for someone else. Years later, she reached out to … Read More »

The post STRUGGLE SESSION: Reassessing Relationships, Interrogating Desires, Snipping Ligaments and More! appeared first on Dan Savage.

Profile

ashnistrike: (Default)
ashnistrike

January 2019

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 08:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios